2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2978374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface traps in vapor-phase-grown bulk ZnO studied by deep level transient spectroscopy

Abstract: Deep level transient spectroscopy, current-voltage, and capacitance-voltage measurements are used to study interface traps in metal-on-bulk-ZnO Schottky barrier diodes ͑SBDs͒. c-axis-oriented ZnO samples were cut from two different vapor-phase-grown crystals, and Au-and Pd-SBDs were formed on their ͑0001͒ surfaces after remote oxygen-plasma treatment. As compared to Au-SBDs, the Pd-SBDs demonstrated higher reverse-bias leakage current and forward-bias current evidently due to higher carrier concentrations, whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
21
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
9
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…19 DLTS of both Zn-and O-face diodes reveal two dominant traps, including the well-known bulk traps E 3 ͑0.27 eV͒ and E 4 ͑0.49͒. 20,21 However, a surface-related trap, E s ͑Ͻ ϳ 95 nm deep, 0.49 eV͒ for the Pd-/Zn-face SBDs, made on 1 h ROP-treated ZnO, was not observed on the SBDs in this study. Interestingly, preliminary DLTS results reveal that densities of the E 4 trap, consistent with the 2.5 eV emission, in the Au SBDs can be significantly influenced by the surface polarity, i.e., higher on the O face and lower on the Zn face.…”
Section: Figcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…19 DLTS of both Zn-and O-face diodes reveal two dominant traps, including the well-known bulk traps E 3 ͑0.27 eV͒ and E 4 ͑0.49͒. 20,21 However, a surface-related trap, E s ͑Ͻ ϳ 95 nm deep, 0.49 eV͒ for the Pd-/Zn-face SBDs, made on 1 h ROP-treated ZnO, was not observed on the SBDs in this study. Interestingly, preliminary DLTS results reveal that densities of the E 4 trap, consistent with the 2.5 eV emission, in the Au SBDs can be significantly influenced by the surface polarity, i.e., higher on the O face and lower on the Zn face.…”
Section: Figcontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…For PdSCs on the Zn face, we see a similar behavior. For a 1 h ROP, a surface trap Es is observed, 4 while for a 2 h ROP, Es disappears, leaving a larger E3 peak and a very weak E4 trap ͑not shown͒. As reported previously, 4 Es ͑0.49 eV͒ is located at depths less than about 95 nm below the Pd/ ZnO interface and shows an electron capture behavior indicative of extended defects.…”
Section: Observation Of Surface Traps On Zn Facesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…For a 1 h ROP, a surface trap Es is observed, 4 while for a 2 h ROP, Es disappears, leaving a larger E3 peak and a very weak E4 trap ͑not shown͒. As reported previously, 4 Es ͑0.49 eV͒ is located at depths less than about 95 nm below the Pd/ ZnO interface and shows an electron capture behavior indicative of extended defects. Thus, from the comparisons presented above, we can conclude that a long ROP treatment is effective at removing extended-defect-related surface traps on the Zn face of ZnO.…”
Section: Observation Of Surface Traps On Zn Facesupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations