2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.04.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface treatment of TiO2 nanoparticles via sol–gel method: Effect of silane type on hydrophobicity of the nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A broad O 1s signal at 531.70 eV also confirms the presence of surface oxide, mostly ZnO for the DX56 substrate. Figure shows that, after Ti(OiPr) 4 treatment, Ti 2p 1/2 and Ti 2p 3/2 peaks are observed at 458.0 and 463.7 eV in agreement with previous studies . The O 1s signal also splits into two peaks at 531.2 and 529.5 eV for ZnO and the newly formed TiO 2 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A broad O 1s signal at 531.70 eV also confirms the presence of surface oxide, mostly ZnO for the DX56 substrate. Figure shows that, after Ti(OiPr) 4 treatment, Ti 2p 1/2 and Ti 2p 3/2 peaks are observed at 458.0 and 463.7 eV in agreement with previous studies . The O 1s signal also splits into two peaks at 531.2 and 529.5 eV for ZnO and the newly formed TiO 2 …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Figure 3 shows that, after Ti(OiPr) 4 treatment, Ti 2p 1/2 and Ti 2p 3/2 peaks are observed at 458.0 and 463.7 eV in agreement with previous studies. [29][30][31] The O 1s signal also splits into two peaks at 531.2 and 529.5 eV for ZnO and the newly formed TiO 2 . 32 TiO 2 -coated DX56 treated with C8 shows an intense F 1s photoelectron peak at 689.9 eV (S14) confirming the presence of fluorine on the surface.…”
Section: Scanning Electron Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Titanium dioxide nanoparticles represent a promising alternative regarding contaminated wastewater treatment, thanks to their excellent photocatalytic activity and large surface area [3][4][5]. However, the separation of the nanoparticles from the aqueous solution once the process has finished represents a major drawback for their application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally occurring silica is crystalline and exists as sand, glass, quartz, etc., whereas synthetic silica is amorphous. Most nanoparticles synthesis techniques, such as physical vapor deposition, precipitation and sol-gel methods are expensive and complex and offer only limited control over particle size and size uniformity [10][11][12][13][14]. Silica nanoparticles are often produced using chemical methods such as sol-gel and deposition [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%