2008
DOI: 10.1889/jsid16.10.1051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface treatment, reflectance, and age effects on electronic‐paper reading performance

Abstract: Abstract— This study is intended to explore the legibility and visual fatigue of different age users under various surface treatments and reflectance of electronic paper. Through the method of character‐search task, the results indicated that compared with single types of treatment [anti‐reflection (AR) 0.8%, anti‐glare, 43% haze), the compound treatment of anti‐reflection and anti‐glare (ARC) exhibited the same legibility, and it showed superior properties to effectively reduce visual fatigue. Hence, it is su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, presbyopia, age-related reduction in accommodative amplitude, starts developing at the age of 40, and it causes the visual system to become easily fatigued (Eskridge, 1984). As the number of people over the age of 40 is expected to increase globally (2015: 35%, 2030: 41%; U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015) and presbyopic individuals are likely to perform VDT tasks, studies on visual fatigue in this group are important (Y. T. Lin, Lin, Hwang, & Jeng, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, presbyopia, age-related reduction in accommodative amplitude, starts developing at the age of 40, and it causes the visual system to become easily fatigued (Eskridge, 1984). As the number of people over the age of 40 is expected to increase globally (2015: 35%, 2030: 41%; U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015) and presbyopic individuals are likely to perform VDT tasks, studies on visual fatigue in this group are important (Y. T. Lin, Lin, Hwang, & Jeng, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y.‐T. Lin et al () indicated that e‐books search accuracy of senior citizens was significantly inferior to that of young adults. Gao and Sun () indicated that older participants had a poorer performance with touchscreen gestures than younger participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y.‐T. Lin, Lin, Hwang, Jeng, and Liao () also examined the difference between young people and elder people in electronic paper reading performance. H.‐C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have also shown that reading performances of users at different ages vary when reading tasks are performed on various mobile devices, such as handheld computers [18], PDAs [19], and devices with electronic paper displays [5]. As we have expected, most of above studies conclude that young people have better reading performance than elder ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…With the rapid advances of display technology, electronic paper has possessed more characteristics of conventional paper, such as the ability to roll or bend, that can enhance reading comfort and experience [3]. Past studies have also investigated the reading performance of electronic paper displays and indicated that surface treatment and bending curvature bring the significant impacts in participants' reading performance [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%