2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface worm algorithm for abelian Gauge–Higgs systems on the lattice

Abstract: The Prokof'ev Svistunov worm algorithm was originally developed for models with nearest neighbor interactions that in a high temperature expansion are mapped to systems of closed loops. In this work we present the surface worm algorithm (SWA) which is a generalization of the worm algorithm concept to abelian Gauge-Higgs models on a lattice which can be mapped to systems of surfaces and loops (dual representation). Using Gauge-Higgs models with gauge groups Z 3 and U(1) we compare the SWA to the conventional ap… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
98
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) plotted against L on a double logarithmic scale, we do not observe a systematic variation with the spatial extent L and the results from determinations based on τ int,cut , τ int,f it and τ exp,f it agree within a a relative error of 5%. Quoting again the results from the largest volume pair we find z int,cut = 1.3448 (7) and z int,f it = 1.34076 (8), which combine to a value of z int = 1.342 (2). The result for the dynamical critical exponent determined from the exponential autocorrelation time is z exp = 1.3478 (3), and also for q = 4 we find very good agreement of the results for z.…”
Section: Exploratory Assessment Of the Algorithm For Q ≤ 4 (2 Nd Ordesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…5) plotted against L on a double logarithmic scale, we do not observe a systematic variation with the spatial extent L and the results from determinations based on τ int,cut , τ int,f it and τ exp,f it agree within a a relative error of 5%. Quoting again the results from the largest volume pair we find z int,cut = 1.3448 (7) and z int,f it = 1.34076 (8), which combine to a value of z int = 1.342 (2). The result for the dynamical critical exponent determined from the exponential autocorrelation time is z exp = 1.3478 (3), and also for q = 4 we find very good agreement of the results for z.…”
Section: Exploratory Assessment Of the Algorithm For Q ≤ 4 (2 Nd Ordesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For the Yang-Mills part, it is advantageous to perform a character expansion 5) where the factor c 0 (β) can be neglected as it is independent of gauge links and cancels in expectation values. In earlier publications [8,9,23], we have shown how to compute the effective gauge theory up to rather high orders in the fundamental character expansion coefficient u(β) ≡ a f (β) = β 18 + .…”
Section: Pure Gauge Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the Pauli principle for N f = 1 does not admit spin 1/2 doublets. The quark number density and the energy density then follow as 5) where the derivative with respect to a has to be taken at constant fugacity exp(aµN τ ) and we have made use of eq. (2.50).…”
Section: Jhep09(2014)131mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important feature is that the original symmetries of the system are translated into constraints such as flux conservation or restrictions on the allowed occupation numbers. Typically these constraints are central in Monte Carlo simulations such as in the Worm algorithm [13] or generalizations thereof [14]. Dual representations are in general not unique: a model can have several dual representations which may have different residual sign problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%