2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surface Wound Mapping of battlefield occulo-facial injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1). [1][2][3][4][5] This trend is in agreement with studies done by the military services of other nations over the same time period. 6 Factors affecting this trend are the increased protection of other parts of the body, increased use of fragmentation weapons in general, and increased use of explosive type weapons in particular, such as the improvised explosive devices (IEDs) used by opposing forces in modern day asymmetrical warfare.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). [1][2][3][4][5] This trend is in agreement with studies done by the military services of other nations over the same time period. 6 Factors affecting this trend are the increased protection of other parts of the body, increased use of fragmentation weapons in general, and increased use of explosive type weapons in particular, such as the improvised explosive devices (IEDs) used by opposing forces in modern day asymmetrical warfare.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Percentage of eye injuries out of all combat injuries for US forces involved in major conflicts from 1865-2009 [1][2][3][4][5]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[38][39][40] This is starkly apparent in military medicine; the incidence of eye injuries in recent conflicts has risen to about 13% of all casualties. 38,39,[41][42][43] Diagnostic techniques presently used to detect and localize FBs include (in approximate chronological order of development) clinical examination, plain radiographs, metal detectors, ophthalmic and general ultrasound (US), CT, MRI, and ultrasound biomicroscopy.…”
Section: Fb Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Çà äàíèìè êë³í³êè îôòàëüìîëî㳿 Íàö³îíàëüíîãî â³éñüêîâî-ìåäè÷íîãî êë³í³÷íîãî öåíòðó ñòàíîì íà 2017 ð³ê ó ñòðóêòóð³ îôòàëüìî-ëîã³÷íèõ óøêîäaeåíü 52 % -îñêîëêîâ³ òà ³íø³ ìåõàí³÷í³ ïîøêîäaeåííÿ âíàñë³äîê ì³ííî-âèáóõîâîãî âðàaeåííÿ [1]. Ïðè ÷àñòêîâ³é âòðàò³ çîðó òðàâìàòè÷íîãî ïîõîäaeåííÿ âíàñë³äîê ïîðàíåííÿ â áîþ, íà ïîñòðàaeäàëîãî âïëèâàþòü ïîòóaeí³ ñòðåñîâ³ ÷èííèêè, ÿê³ íàêëàäàþòü â³äáèòîê íà ñòàí ïñèõ³÷íîãî çäîðîâ'ÿ ïîòåðï³ëîãî [2][3][4]. Öå ÿâèùà ïñèõ³÷íî¿ äåçàäàïòàö³¿, ÷åðåç çì³íó öèâ³ëüíîãî ñïîñîáó aeèòòÿ íà â³éñüêîâèé òà ó÷àñòü ó áîéîâèõ ä³ÿõ.…”
Section: âñòóïunclassified