2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surfactant effects on the particle size of iron (III) oxides formed by sol–gel synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few processes that are currently being investigated and refined to produce high-quality nanomaterials are chemical vapour deposition to produce carbon nanotubes and carbon nanostructures [6, 7], ultrasound techniques to produce nanohydroxyapatite crystals for biomedical applications [8, 9] and the wet sol-gel synthesis method for creating iron oxide (Fe 2 O 3 ) nanoparticles [10, 11]. The most attractive feature of using nanotechnology-based processing techniques is that it gives the manufacturer far greater control over the polydiversity, phase, crystalline structure, topography, morphology, and quality of the nanomaterials produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few processes that are currently being investigated and refined to produce high-quality nanomaterials are chemical vapour deposition to produce carbon nanotubes and carbon nanostructures [6, 7], ultrasound techniques to produce nanohydroxyapatite crystals for biomedical applications [8, 9] and the wet sol-gel synthesis method for creating iron oxide (Fe 2 O 3 ) nanoparticles [10, 11]. The most attractive feature of using nanotechnology-based processing techniques is that it gives the manufacturer far greater control over the polydiversity, phase, crystalline structure, topography, morphology, and quality of the nanomaterials produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surfactant interfered in the growth stage of the iron oxide nanoparticles (gel phase) and prevented the formation of a gel. This occurred because the NaDDBS molecules had already coordinated to the iron (III) centers due to the attraction between the negatively-charged hydrophilic head of the surfactant and the positively-charged iron (Matarredona et al, 2003;Camponeschi et al, 2008). Therefore, due to the presence of the NaDDBS molecules, no aggregates of γ-Fe 2 O 3 were formed but rather the nanoparticles remained individually isolated and dispersed along the length of the CNTs.…”
Section: Wwwintechopencommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(N, N`-bis(β-Salicylalimino ethyl)-2,6-pyridine di carboxylic acid) was derived from salicylaldehyde and acetyl acetone with Di aliphatic and aromatic amines (5) .Complexes of transition metal (Cu +2 ,Co +2 ,Mn +2 ,Pd +2 ) with (N,N`-bis(β-Salicylalimino ethyl)-2,6-pyridine di carboxylic acid) ligand were prepared (6) . This ligand and it`s metal complexes were characterized by using FTIR, HNMR and Mass spectroscopy (7) .Schiff base complexes with transition metal were used as antibacterial and antifungal (8) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%