2022
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2022.324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surfactant modified waste ash for the removal of chloro and nitro group substituted benzene from wastewater

Abstract: A surfactant-modified coal fly ash was developed as a multifunctional adsorbent for the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was used to modify the surface of coal fly ash (CFA). The modified CFA was characterized using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), surface porosity analyzer, Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Fourier transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The results showed that loading CFA with SDS not only improved the functionality and surface morphology of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both ashes, the first mass losses below 100°C were attributed to the removal of moisture. The second mass loss between 100-520°C for CFA and 100-410°C for CBA might be originated from the removal of adsorbed structural water molecules [53]. In addition, the total amounts of water were calculated to be 0.49% for CFA and 0.78% for CBA.…”
Section: Characterizations Of Cfa and Cbamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both ashes, the first mass losses below 100°C were attributed to the removal of moisture. The second mass loss between 100-520°C for CFA and 100-410°C for CBA might be originated from the removal of adsorbed structural water molecules [53]. In addition, the total amounts of water were calculated to be 0.49% for CFA and 0.78% for CBA.…”
Section: Characterizations Of Cfa and Cbamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These treatment methods have proven to be efficient in removing both contaminants (removal = up to 80%). However, the high infrastructure and operational costs are not the only limiting factors for their use (USD 10-450/m 3 ), which is mainly in developing countries [12,15,16]. Additional disadvantages include variable reagent dosing, low mineralization (in the case of ozonation), high energy consumption (electrooxidation), and short lifespan due to saturation (membrane filtration, zero-valent iron particles).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, adsorption using husks, seeds, fibers, and other agro-industrial residues offers significant advantages [1]. Using bio-adsorbents derived from these materials could also be profitable, since their benefits include high availability (1000 million tons annually worldwide) [17], simple conditioning, and being 28% less expensive (operating and maintenance) than conventional wastewater treatments (USD 5-200/m 3 ) [16,18,19]. Moreover, their composition (minerals, lipids, polyphenols, and lignocellulosic compounds) allows them to have a variety of functional groups (hydroxyl, carbonyl, carboxyl, methylene, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%