With rising CO2 emissions and growing interests towards CO2 valorization, electrochemical CO2 reduction (eCO2R) has emerged as a promising prospect for carbon recycling and chemical energy storage. Yet, product selectivity and electrocatalyst longevity persist as obstacles to the broad implementation of eCO2R. A possible solution to ameliorate this challenge is to pulse the applied potential. However, it is currently unclear whether and how the trends and lessons obtained from the more conventional constant potential eCO2R translate to pulsed potential eCO2R. In this work, we report that the relationship between electrolyte concentration/composition and product distribution for pulsed potential eCO2R is different from constant potential eCO2R. In the case of constant potential eCO2R, increasing KHCO3 concentration favors the formation of H2 and CH4. In contrast, for pulsed potential eCO2R, H2 formation is suppressed due to the periodic desorption of surface protons, while CH4 is still favored. In the case of KCl, increasing the concentration during constant potential eCO2R does not affect product distribution, mainly producing H2 and CO. However, increasing KCl concentration during pulsed potential eCO2R persistently suppresses H2 formation and greatly favors C2 products, reaching 71 % Faradaic efficiency. Collectively, these results provide new mechanistic insights into the pulsed eCO2R mechanism within the context of proton‐donator ability and ionic conductivity.