2001
DOI: 10.1007/s003480100277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surge effect during the water exit of an axisymmetric body traveling normal to a plane interface: experiments and BEM simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first contact time of the three phase-indicator functions is almost the same. This demonstrates the negligible effect of the probe on bubble behavior before the first contact and it is consistent with observation and analysis of the local interface deformation during piercing (Liju et al, 2001). Oppositely, the three last-contact times significantly differ.…”
Section: Probe Signal and Phase-indicating Functionssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The first contact time of the three phase-indicator functions is almost the same. This demonstrates the negligible effect of the probe on bubble behavior before the first contact and it is consistent with observation and analysis of the local interface deformation during piercing (Liju et al, 2001). Oppositely, the three last-contact times significantly differ.…”
Section: Probe Signal and Phase-indicating Functionssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Calculations using boundary element methods and potential flow assumption 11 show that, in general, the amplitude of this deformation is much smaller than the tip radius. 1͑a͔͒; when the probe tip approaches the bubble surface a deformation is produced due to the probe-induced liquid pressure over the bubble: The "surge effect".…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barrau et al 5 reverse the explanation for optical probes by Carrica et al 7 and attribute the systematic underestimations observed in the optical probes measurements to the blinding effect. Outside the blind zone the underestimation of the chord length is very small since the surge effect 11 only gives a small deformation. The size of this region is based on a critical dimensionless radial coordinate for the piercing, instead of the tip radius.…”
Section: B Probe-bubble Interaction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results at initial stage were compared with those from small-time expansion solution by Tyvand & Miloh (1995) and simulation was terminated before the breakup of the free surface or body piercing. Liju et al (2001) considered water exit of an axisymmetric body at different Froude number using BEM. Numerical result was compared with their experimental data from a model test in small scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%