Surgeon-patient communication in oncology

Abstract

Little is known about the quality of post‐operative communications following oncological surgery and the satisfaction of patients with the communication process. Thirty‐eight patients who underwent surgery for primary gastrointestinal cancer were interviewed before being discharged from the hospital. The patients' recall of information concerning the surgery, histological diagnosis, post‐operative therapy and treatment goal was assessed. The congruence between the information provided by the surgeons and that retained by the patients was evaluated. The information provided by the surgeons about the diagnosis, histology and post‐operative therapy plan was correctly recalled by over 92%, 81% and 97% of the patients respectively. Only 70% of the patients correctly recalled information about the goal of the treatment. Moreover, patients receiving only palliative treatment showed less recall of information about the treatment goal than patients receiving curative treatment (33% versus 89%). The surgeons reported that only 35% of the patients left the hospital completely informed. Overall, the patients were highly satisfied with their communication with their surgeon, and the patients' recall of information was generally good. The information given by the surgeons was often incomplete, however. Our explorative analysis showed that the quality of communication was often worse for patients with a palliative treatment goal than for patients with a curative treatment goal.

How Cardiologists Present the Benefits of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions to Patients With Stable Angina

“…In one study, 18 surgeons provided adequate information about a procedure's risk, benefits, and alternatives, but did not respond to patients questions well. Another study 19 found that cardiologists' communication regarding implantable cardiac defibrillators was characterized by unclear representation and omission of information, and a study 20 of information provided following surgery for gastrointestinal cancer found incomplete exchange, particularly for patients receiving palliative care. Given the importance of information exchange in shared decision making, this finding highlights a critical area to assess further.…”

Older Patients’ Recall of Online Cancer Information: Do Ability and Motivation Matter More than Chronological Age?

“…Earlier research has suggested that older adults often have completed lower levels of education (Bostock & Steptoe, 2012), which has been found to influence recall of information (Wagner, Wuensch, Friess, & Berberat, 2014). Furthermore, health literacy, i.e., "the degree to which individuals can obtain, process, understand, and communicate about healthrelated information needed to make informed health decisions (Berkman, Davis, & McCormack, 2010, p. 16)," declines with age (Baker, Gazmararian, Sudano, & Patterson, 2000), which consequently affects recall negatively (McCray, 2005).…”

Oncologist, patient, and companion questions during pretreatment consultations about adjuvant cancer treatment: a shared decision-making perspective

“…Cancer patients often feel overwhelmed by the amount of information they receive during consultations, and they often misunderstand the information that oncologists provide, such as about prognosis and treatment goal . These findings make clear how important it is for oncologists to tailor their information to patients' prior knowledge and to find out whether patients understand what they are being told.…”