Surgeon-Patient Information Disclosure Practices in Southwestern Nigeria

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the practice of information disclosure to patients by surgeons in Nigeria. Subjects and Methods: A 55-item self-administered semi-structured questionnaire was sent to 150 surgeons in southwestern Nigeria in 2004–2005. The data obtained from the completed questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 150 surgeons, 102 completed the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 68.0%. Of these 102, 85 (85.3%) were men, 44 (43.1%) were consultants and 55 (54.0%) were senior and junior surgical trainees. Most were from surgical subspecialties and obstetrics and gynecology. A documented policy statement about information disclosure was not available in most hospitals. A third, i.e. 35 (34.3%), of the surgeons did not routinely engage patients in discussions about disease diagnosis, management and prognosis. Most, i.e. 73 (71.6%), would rather disclose worsening disease progression to the patient’s spouse. Others would disclose such information to the patient’s children, family members or clergy. This was presumably to shield the patient from psychological distress. Only 22 (21.6%) of them routinely disclose operative findings to patients or their families. Thirty (29.4%) of them had been involved in disclosing medical errors to their patients in the past while 63 (61.8%) respondents did not know if surgical errors with potentially negative consequences should be disclosed. Conclusion: Most of the surgeons in southwestern Nigeria did not routinely provide detailed information to patients about their illness and possible outcome of illness even in the presence of worsening disease progression and prognosis. When surgical errors with potential negative consequences occurred, the majority did not know if such errors should be disclosed.

Perceptions of the general public and physicians regarding open disclosure in Korea: a qualitative study

“…In particular, physicians were cynical of the effect of open disclosure on reducing lawsuits and related costs. According to previous studies, some found that open disclosure does not increase the likelihood of lawsuits from the general public [ 23 – 25 ], although one study showed that a fair number of physicians disagreed with its effects on medical lawsuits [ 26 ]. Furthermore, two studies of observational data reported that open disclosure reduced the number of medical lawsuits and their related costs [ 27 , 28 ].…”

Informed Consent under the Ghana Health Service Patients Charter: Practice and Awareness

“…In a related study from Nigeria, it was shown that most surgeons fall short in providing necessary information to patients about their illnesses when obtaining consents for surgical interventions [9].…”

Comparisons of the Tono-Pen® and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in the Measurement of Intraocular Pressure of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Patients in a Hospital Population in Southwest Nigeria

“…The implication for practice is that the eye care provider should ask the patient which instrument he or she prefers. In a Nigerian survey [ 28 ], up to 34.3% of surgeons did not routinely discuss management options with patients or their families.…”