Surgeons' opinions about the NHMRC clinical practice guidelines for the management of early breast cancer

Abstract

Objective: To explore the opinions of surgeons about the NHMRC clinical practice guidelines for the management of early breast cancer (the Guidelines) and their views about and use of the accompanying Consumer's guide. Design: Cross‐sectional telephone survey. Participants and setting: Surgeons throughout Australia who manage breast cancer, designated as “breast” or “general” (members or non‐members of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons' Section of Breast Surgery) and “urban” or “rural”. Results: Among 150 respondents (64% response rate) more than 80% of surgeons reported having read all or most of the Guidelines and believed they were useful in improving women's management and wellbeing, easy to understand, evidence­ based, a good summary of recent evidence, and that they would assist agreement between women and healthcare providers. Surgeons agreed with most of the recommendations in the Guidelines, but 26% disagreed that “women should ideally be treated by a specialist who treats a large number of similar patients and who has access to the full range of treatment options in a multidisciplinary setting”. In terms of medicolegal implications, 41% believed that the Guidelines would protect clinicians, while, of the 37% of surgeons who believed that they would expose doctors to increased problems, significantly more breast than general surgeons believed this (50% v. 19%; P<0.001). Only 37% of surgeons routinely gave the Consumer's guide to all or more than half their patients. Conclusions: Surgeons are generally positive about the Guidelines, but certain issues should be addressed if they are to be optimally implemented, including confusion about the medicolegal implications, perceived difficulties with providing multidisciplinary care and poor use of the Consumer's guide.

Long‐term survival outcomes following breast cancer surgery in Western Australia

“…26 A survey of Australian surgeons who treat breast cancer found that rural surgeons were more likely to disagree with this recommendation or find this recommendation difficult to meet compared to urban surgeons. 27 The recommended radiotherapy treatment following breast conserving surgery is currently only available in the metropolitan area of Perth 28 and while it was not possible in the present study to determine the type of systemic adjuvant therapy used, it would be interesting to investigate if rural surgeons differed in their approach compared to metropolitan surgeons. Surgeons in regional hospitals may not have been as experienced in removing breast tumours as those surgeons operating in metropolitan Perth.…”

Getting an evidence‐based post‐partum haemorrhage policy into practice

“…Questionnaire items were based on previously published questionnaires 8,9 and discussion with researchers in the field of guidelines implementation and midwives. Pilot testing was carried out among nursing unit managers of labour wards or maternity units from hospitals of each level in NSW (Table 1).…”

Multidisciplinary care for women with early breast cancer in the Australian context: what does it mean?

“…The difficulty of providing multidisciplinary care in the Australian context is illustrated by the results of a survey 14 of 150 surgeons about their opinions of the NHMRC's clinical practice guidelines 11 . While surgeons were generally positive about the guidelines, 44% of rural and 10% of urban surgeons disagreed with the recommendation that “women should ideally be treated by a specialist who treats a large number of similar patients and who has access to the full range of treatment options in a multidisciplinary setting”.…”