2017
DOI: 10.1177/0003489416683193
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgery for Cholesteatomatous Labyrinthine Fistula

Abstract: The level of evidence on which to base surgical decision making related to cholesteatomatous labyrinthine fistula is poor, and the data do not demonstrate significant differences in hearing outcomes based on surgical technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The surgeon faced the unenviable choice of having either to dissect the cholesteatoma matrix off the fistula endothelium or create a mastoid cavity with its attendant long-term consequences. If the fistula involved the cochlea, the surgical consequences were notably worse 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The surgeon faced the unenviable choice of having either to dissect the cholesteatoma matrix off the fistula endothelium or create a mastoid cavity with its attendant long-term consequences. If the fistula involved the cochlea, the surgical consequences were notably worse 4 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The otological literature contains many articles concerned with the treatment of fistulas of the labyrinth due to cholesteatoma. A recent systematic review has summarised the available information 4 . In essence, there are two principal techniques for dealing with cholesteatoma over a labyrinthine fistula: (1) complete removal of cholesteatoma matrix, including over the fistula, and repair of any ensuing labyrinthine defect; and (2) exteriorisation, in which the cholesteatoma over the fistula is left in place, whilst the cholesteatoma bed is saucerised by forming a cavity with removal of the posterior ear canal wall 4 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some surgeons have argued for conservative management, leaving the overlying cholesteatoma matrix undisturbed for cases with large-sized fistulas, while others prefer complete removal of the matrix regardless of size. 5,6,[8][9][10][11][12] Supporters of conservative management warn against postoperative sensorineural hearing loss caused by potential intraoperative opening of the labyrinth, whereas advocates of complete matrix removal point out that the remaining matrix could predispose to further progression, leading to suppurative labyrinthitis. 6,8,[13][14][15] Because these debates have not yet been resolved, the optimal approach to management still needs to be examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%