2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical care burden in orbito-temporal neurofibromatosis: Multiple procedures and surgical care duration analysis in 47 consecutive adult patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical case series, primarily in adults, also have not focused on ophthalmic characteristics or outcomes. 12, 14, 17-20 While the surgical techniques described in these case series are important, without a well-defined indication for treatment or a formal definition of “therapeutic success,” it is difficult to determine if and when intervention is indicated, and whether an intervention is actually beneficial. Improvement in physical appearance and visual outcomes (i.e., avoiding or decreasing amblyopia) are the most common indications for medical and or surgical treatment, yet neither has been well studied nor have they been included in clinical trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical case series, primarily in adults, also have not focused on ophthalmic characteristics or outcomes. 12, 14, 17-20 While the surgical techniques described in these case series are important, without a well-defined indication for treatment or a formal definition of “therapeutic success,” it is difficult to determine if and when intervention is indicated, and whether an intervention is actually beneficial. Improvement in physical appearance and visual outcomes (i.e., avoiding or decreasing amblyopia) are the most common indications for medical and or surgical treatment, yet neither has been well studied nor have they been included in clinical trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the focus of studies on skull base dysplasia in NF1 is on the pathognomonic malformation of the sphenoid bone, especially the wings and the sella turcica (18). Individual studies also focus on the deformation of adjacent bones (11,13,54,56), shortening of the anterior skull base (57), and they discuss surgical procedures to correct orbital dysplasia (58)(59)(60)(61)(62). Some authors are concerned with whether the sphenoid bone changes are genuine skeletal malformations or the consequence of a tumour manifestation, but they do not address the pneumatisation of the bone (13,(63)(64)(65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autologous bone grafts from the iliac or calvarial bones were originally adopted as replacement materials for skull base defects, 6,7 but recurrence has been reported in NF1 patients. The absence of neurofibromin in NF1 patients results in the upregulation of osteoclasts and downregulation of osteoblasts, which makes reconstructed autogenous bone grafts susceptible to resorption 3,4 . Conversely, reconstructions with titanium meshes have shown reliable results 7–9 as they can be easily shaped to fit different bony contours and have shown good durability and biocompatibility in craniofacial reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Rarely, sufficient bony defects may ultimately result in herniation of the temporal lobe into the orbital fossa, causing proptosis and pulsatile exophthalmos with subsequent incomplete eyelid closure, diplopia, vision loss, or even severe facial deformity. 3 In such circumstances, surgical intervention is required to prevent visual complications due to hemimegalencephaly and restore symmetric facial appearance. However, the reconstruction of a complex skull base defect while fulfilling cosmetic needs is challenging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation