1996
DOI: 10.1097/00002517-199606000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Correction of Vertebral Axial Rotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, surgical planning remains difficult, as the parameters classically taken into account are bi-dimensional (based on X-ray projections) and of a static nature (CHEUNG and LUK, 1997;KLEINMAN et al, 1982;MASON et al, 1998;VAUGHAN et al, 1996;VEDANTAM et al, 2000). it seems reasonable to propose that surgical planning should take into account the deformity in each plane (ARONSSON et al, 1996;LENKE et al, 1998). Moreover, in the literature, there is rich information on the morphological and functional alterations of tnmk musculature in AID (AvIKAINEN et al, 1999;BYLUND et al, 1987;CHAN et al, 1999;FORD et al, 1984;GRAM and HASAN, 1999;GUTH et al, 1978;HOPF et al, 1998;HSU et al, 1988;KENNELLY and STOKES, 1993;KHOSLA et al, 1980;MANNION et al, 1998;MEIER et al, 1998;MOONEY et al, 2000;REUBEN et al, 1983;SAHGAL et al, 1983;YEKUTIEL et al, 1981 ;ZETTERBERG et al, 1983;.…”
Section: Rms Values" Of Apical Recording Sites" and Kinematics Lateramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, surgical planning remains difficult, as the parameters classically taken into account are bi-dimensional (based on X-ray projections) and of a static nature (CHEUNG and LUK, 1997;KLEINMAN et al, 1982;MASON et al, 1998;VAUGHAN et al, 1996;VEDANTAM et al, 2000). it seems reasonable to propose that surgical planning should take into account the deformity in each plane (ARONSSON et al, 1996;LENKE et al, 1998). Moreover, in the literature, there is rich information on the morphological and functional alterations of tnmk musculature in AID (AvIKAINEN et al, 1999;BYLUND et al, 1987;CHAN et al, 1999;FORD et al, 1984;GRAM and HASAN, 1999;GUTH et al, 1978;HOPF et al, 1998;HSU et al, 1988;KENNELLY and STOKES, 1993;KHOSLA et al, 1980;MANNION et al, 1998;MEIER et al, 1998;MOONEY et al, 2000;REUBEN et al, 1983;SAHGAL et al, 1983;YEKUTIEL et al, 1981 ;ZETTERBERG et al, 1983;.…”
Section: Rms Values" Of Apical Recording Sites" and Kinematics Lateramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For pre-operative planning, this type of investigation can be used to assess curve flexibility and to determine fusion levels (KLEINMAN et al, 1982;VAUGHAN et al, 1996). However, the reliability of existing classification systems and the predictive value of lateral bending radiographs are questioned (ARONSSON et al, 1996;LENKE et al, 1998). Also, other criticisms are related to the fact that sagittal and transverse plane deformities may not be appropriately evaluated by this technique, where repeated ionising radiation is administered to young subjects in their growth period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, supine side-bending has been considered the standard method for curve assessment and surgical decision-making [9,15]. However, some authors have suggested that the correlation of preoperative supine sidebending radiographs and postoperative curve correction is suboptimal [16][17][18], especially as pedicle screw utilization has become increasingly popular. An additional disadvantage of supine side-bending imaging is that it is not standardized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, we know that it is also very difficult for an expert to separate these two groups using radiographs of the spine when the main curvature of the double major curve is thoracic. Thus, the clinicians in addition to the difference of the Cobb angle, develop the classification based on the curve reduction between X-ray acquired in standing position and those acquired in lateral flexion position [36]. On the other hand, the moderate predictive capacity of our classification system for class 2 comes also from the small number of the patients who have double major curve in the cohort.…”
Section: Performance Of Our Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%