2015
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical cut‐down or percutaneous access—which is best for less vascular access complications in transfemoral TAVI?

Abstract: Surgical cut-down provided a convenient and controlled access, resulting in less access and bleeding complications. Nontheless, major access complication differed not significantly. Both approaches must be seen as complementary techniques. A portfolio containing both techniques is the exclusive way to provide a tailor-made and patient-orientated approach. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tortuosity was graded as none, mild (30‐60°), moderate (60‐90°), or severe (>90°). MDCT calcification was graded as none, mild (some calcification), moderate (the arterial course can be seen without contrast dye injection), or severe (heavily calcified iliofemoral arteries) . The sheath to femoral artery ratio (SFAR) was defined as the ratio between the sheath outer diameter and the femoral artery MLD, while the unexpanded sheath diameter was used for the calculation…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tortuosity was graded as none, mild (30‐60°), moderate (60‐90°), or severe (>90°). MDCT calcification was graded as none, mild (some calcification), moderate (the arterial course can be seen without contrast dye injection), or severe (heavily calcified iliofemoral arteries) . The sheath to femoral artery ratio (SFAR) was defined as the ratio between the sheath outer diameter and the femoral artery MLD, while the unexpanded sheath diameter was used for the calculation…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 While greater sheath-to-artery diameter ratio 49,50 and sheath-to-artery area ratio 49 independently predict incident vascular complications, the latter metric appears to be more sensitive. The subclavian approach is safe and feasible with procedural success rates, safety end points, including major vascular complications, and life-threatening bleeding similar to those seen with TF-TAVR.…”
Section: Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 A propensity-matched comparison of open surgical versus percutaneous access for TF-TAVR suggested no difference in the incidence of vascular complications but shorter length of stay with the latter. 50 Vascular closure. There are limited and conflicting data from studies comparing the Prostar XL and ProGlide hemostasis devices in the setting of TAVR.…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Percutaneous approach has shown similar in-hospital or 30-day mortality rates compared with surgical cutdown approach in several reports. [36][37][38][39][40][41] Vascular complications were also compared between the two approaches, demonstrating varying incidence rates across studies ranging from 2.4% to 27.1% for major vascular complications when the percutaneous approach is used. 40 The wide variation is due to discrepancy regarding definition of complications, the type and the generation of the transcatheter heart valve, and the study periods.…”
Section: Percutaneous Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%