Ganglions are the most common benign soft tissue tumours of the hand and wrist (1). The indications for treatment include pain, stiffness, weakness and cosmetic concern. There are many potential treatment modalities but aspiration is the most common. Although there is a large body of evidence addressing short-term outcomes following aspiration, few studies have reported long-term outcomes and even fewer have reported patient satisfaction following treatment. The objective of the present study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and the long-term rate of recurrence following wrist ganglion aspiration.
METHODSFollowing Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board (Ottawa, Ontario) approval, a retrospective study was initiated. Charts of all patients with a single dorsal or volar wrist ganglion treated between 2001 and 2011 were reviewed; patients with multiple ganglions were excluded. A single surgeon treated all patients. When patients desired intervention for their symptomatic ganglion, the surgeon's practice was to treat with aspiration and not surgical excision. Ganglions were aspirated using an 18-gauge needle, and the surgeon facilitated aspiration by massaging the ganglion fluid toward the aspirating needle with a finger. Demographic (date of birth, treatment date, sex) and clinical data (ganglion location, size, treatment, reason for seeking treatment) were retrieved from electronic patient records. Patients were contacted by telephone and asked to complete a questionnaire addressing recurrence, satisfaction and symptomatic improvement (pain, function, range of motion, appearance). Symptomatic improvement was assessed using a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating 'significantly worse' and 5 indicating 'significantly improved'. Statistical analysis was performed using Pearson χ 2 , Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon and Fisher's exact tests.
RESULTSA total of 41 consecutive patients, all treated with aspiration, were identified using hospital records. Of the 41 patients, 21 (51%) consented to the telephone questionnaire, 17 could not be reached due to inadequate hospital records or change in address, one was deceased and two did not consent (Figure 1). Demographic and clinical data from the 41 patients are shown in Table 1. There were no differences in demographic or clinical data between patients who completed the telephone questionnaire and those who did not.Among the 21 patients who completed the telephone questionnaire, the mean (± SE) time to follow-up was 6.3±0.4 years. The rate BACKgROUND: There is a strong body of evidence addressing shortterm outcomes following wrist ganglion aspiration; however, few studies have investigated long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient satisfaction and the long-term rate of recurrence following wrist ganglion aspiration. METHODS: Charts of all patients with a wrist ganglion treated by a single surgeon from 2001 to 2011 were reviewed. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from patient charts. Patients were contacted by telepho...