2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical management of cholesteatoma: The two main options and the third way – atticotomy/limited mastoidectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes postoperative care easier but impedes direct observation of the mastoidectomy during otomicroscopy, making it impossible to clinically detect residual and recurrent cholesteatomas. 33 Current indications for DWI in cholesteatomas have focused on congenital and residual/recurrent disease, 10 because they can be hidden or difficult to evaluate via otoscopy and postsurgical inflammation may lead to confusion on CT and standard MR imaging. DWI is also helpful in distinguishing differential diagnoses of middle ear masses, especially when combined with delayed postcontrast T1WI.…”
Section: The Role Of Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Mr Imaging Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes postoperative care easier but impedes direct observation of the mastoidectomy during otomicroscopy, making it impossible to clinically detect residual and recurrent cholesteatomas. 33 Current indications for DWI in cholesteatomas have focused on congenital and residual/recurrent disease, 10 because they can be hidden or difficult to evaluate via otoscopy and postsurgical inflammation may lead to confusion on CT and standard MR imaging. DWI is also helpful in distinguishing differential diagnoses of middle ear masses, especially when combined with delayed postcontrast T1WI.…”
Section: The Role Of Non-echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Mr Imaging Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two main approaches for cholesteatoma are canal wall up and canal wall down mastoidectomy [Nikolopoulos and Gerbesiotis, 2009]. However, a technically feasible and safe alternative to conventional canal wall up or down technique, atticotomy-limited mastoidectomy with cartilage reconstruction (inside-out ap- [Sadé and Halevy, 1976] and Tos [Tos and Poulsen, 1980] classifications.…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a technically feasible and safe alternative to conventional canal wall up or down technique, atticotomy-limited mastoidectomy with cartilage reconstruction (inside-out ap- [Sadé and Halevy, 1976] and Tos [Tos and Poulsen, 1980] classifications. In cases of eardrum perforation, destruction of <50% of the middle ear mucosa is scored as 2 and >50% is scored as 3. proach), has been widely used by many surgeons in the treatment of cholesteatoma [Dornhoffer, 2000;Lan et al, 2003;DeRowe et al, 2005;Uyar et al, 2006;Nikolopoulos and Gerbesiotis, 2009;Roth and Haeusler, 2009;Hatano et al, 2010]. This method is a less invasive option that produces satisfactory long-term outcomes [Nikolopoulos and Gerbesiotis, 2009].…”
Section: Surgical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mantener el CAE intacto presenta ventajas en relación a los cuidados posoperatorios, permitiendo que éste se pueda mojar y, de esta manera, no limitar las actividades futuras del paciente, hecho que resulta particularmente importante en pacientes jóvenes 5 . Sin embargo, esta alternativa quirúrgica se asocia a altas tasas de enfermedad residual y recidiva recomendándose una cirugía de revisión 6 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified