2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2012.01514.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Management of Coronary Artery Disease Associated with Malignancy

Abstract: Surgical management of patients with combined coronary artery disease and malignancy remains a challenge. In this review the time of surgical intervention, whether to treat the malignancy or the coronary artery disease first, and which bypass technique should be used during myocardial revascularization are reviewed to determine the most optimal strategy to manage patients who require coronary surgical revascularization and present with an underlying malignancy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(202 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simultaneous surgery has already been carried out in the 1980s for combined treatment of pulmonary neoplasia and cardiac surgical disorders. In one stage operation, CABG is performed first, considering cardiac surgery is an aseptic surgery, and cardiac revascularization is carried out first to avoid perioperative myocardial ischemia [25, 26]. Compared to a two-stage operation, a one-stage operation also has advantages including a single induction of general anesthesia, shorter overall hospital stay, and reduced cost of treatment [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneous surgery has already been carried out in the 1980s for combined treatment of pulmonary neoplasia and cardiac surgical disorders. In one stage operation, CABG is performed first, considering cardiac surgery is an aseptic surgery, and cardiac revascularization is carried out first to avoid perioperative myocardial ischemia [25, 26]. Compared to a two-stage operation, a one-stage operation also has advantages including a single induction of general anesthesia, shorter overall hospital stay, and reduced cost of treatment [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, two cases of simultaneous CABG and tumor surgery, including one case each of colon cancer and malignant thymoma, were performed without complications related to perioperative incisional infection, severe bleeding, or a lung infection. Patients with tumors undergoing staged CABG and tumor surgery had the advantage of a low incidence of adverse cardiovascular events, the interval between the two procedures ranged from 5 to 60 days, and it was also considered that there was no significant correlation between the recurrence or metastasis of the tumor and no correlation to the time between staged procedures [23]. In this study, four patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery (esophageal cancer, bladder cancer, lung cancer, and rectal cancer) and staged radical tumor surgery, with an interval of approximately 1-3 months between the two procedures, and there were no in-hospital deaths, and no tumor metastasis or recurrence was found during the follow-up periods, and no cardiovascular adverse events such as angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, ventricular arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death or heart failure occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with acute coronary syndrome, unstable angina pectoris or acute myocardial infarction should undergo myocardial revascularisation before their surgical treatment for neoplastic diseases is scheduled 4. On the other hand, stable coronary artery disease can be managed medically, which does not preclude the definitive treatment of the neoplastic disease 4…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%