2001
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.136.11.1256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Management of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumors of the Pancreas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, there are few data to guide the use of frozen sections in evaluating resection margins for IPMNs without an associated invasive carcinoma. Although the evidence is not strong, further resection is recommended if high-grade dysplasia is present at a resection margin at the time of frozen section 72 . Due to the low probability of a positive result, evaluation of margin status may be inconsequential for cases with branch duct IPMNs without main duct dilatation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, there are few data to guide the use of frozen sections in evaluating resection margins for IPMNs without an associated invasive carcinoma. Although the evidence is not strong, further resection is recommended if high-grade dysplasia is present at a resection margin at the time of frozen section 72 . Due to the low probability of a positive result, evaluation of margin status may be inconsequential for cases with branch duct IPMNs without main duct dilatation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extra-prostatic extension and positive surgical margin are respectively present in 21-28% [ 26 , 27 ] and 21-42% [ 24 , 28 ] of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy, and they are both correlated with poor prognosis [ 26 , 28 30 ]. For some cancers, histopathology of frozen sections is used to evaluate the optimal extent of resection [ 31 33 ]; however, this technique cannot be used to test surgical margins during radical prostatectomy without disrupting the workflow. Typically, it is only after a few days, once the prostate is completely removed and the specimen has been processed (formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded, FFPE), typically a few days following radical prostatectomy, that the presence of cancer at the surgical margins can be assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20,22,40,47,49,57,58,61,[63][64][65][66] Although many surgical series have used frozen sections to help guide the extent of resection for IPMNs, less than half have reported the frequency with which they were positive. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][30][31][32][33][34]38 Comparison of rates of positivity of the resection margins between studies is confounded by the use of different grading systems for dysplasia, by varying definitions of what constitutes a positive margin, and by variable inclusion of IPMNs with associated invasive carcinoma. Most studies published subsequent to 2000 and before 2018 have used the 3-tiered WHO system 67,68 or equivalent 3-tiered terminologies for grading dysplasia in IPMNs and have classified margins involved by IPMN exhibiting any degree of dysplasia as a positive margin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%