1984
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198410000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Management of Thoracolumbar Spinal Injuries General Principles and Controversial Considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[12][13][14] In general, surgery is indicated for any patient who presents with neurologic deficit and unstable spinal burst fracture. 8 Thoracic or lumbar burst fractures can be surgically managed via anterior, posterior, or combined approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14] In general, surgery is indicated for any patient who presents with neurologic deficit and unstable spinal burst fracture. 8 Thoracic or lumbar burst fractures can be surgically managed via anterior, posterior, or combined approaches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Severe posttraumatic vertebral deformity has been shown to correlate with residual local symptoms (Day andKokan 1977, Harkonen et al 1979). Reduction and internal fixation are probably more efficient than nonoperative management for restoring the vertebral anatomy, and stabilization of the fractures prevents additional neural damage and allows earlier mobilization (Jacobs and Casey 1984). However, there are few detailed reports on the ultimate radiographic results achieved by Harrington instrumentation in different types of unstable vertebral fractures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures involving all the columns, on which rotational forces have a greater impact, the most effective spinal canal decompression is attained by an anterior approach. [4][5][6][7] Conversely, in these cases with disruption of all 3 columns, performing anterior and posterior approaches (staged or simultaneously) is another choice of treatment. 8 Although a posterior approach alone can provide good stabilization, its potential failure to provide full reduction of fragments in the vertebral canal, particularly when posterior longitudinal ligament unity is disrupted, is well known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%