2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.01.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical management of truncal and extremities atypical lipomatous tumors/well-differentiated liposarcoma: A systematic review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For inclusion in this study, the patients were also required to have tumors with definitive immunohistochemistry or cytogenetic confirmation of MDM2 amplification to rule out lipomas for WD disease and other sarcoma subtypes for DD disease (e.g., pleomorphic liposarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma). In a recent literature review, only 16.8% of patients (133 out of 793 in total) had this level of diagnostic accuracy 7 . In our opinion, this is critical and may explain the discrepancy in the frequency of DD noted in our study (27.6%) versus 1%–2% in the reported literature in which the denominator may have erroneously included large or atypical lipomas 5–7 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For inclusion in this study, the patients were also required to have tumors with definitive immunohistochemistry or cytogenetic confirmation of MDM2 amplification to rule out lipomas for WD disease and other sarcoma subtypes for DD disease (e.g., pleomorphic liposarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma). In a recent literature review, only 16.8% of patients (133 out of 793 in total) had this level of diagnostic accuracy 7 . In our opinion, this is critical and may explain the discrepancy in the frequency of DD noted in our study (27.6%) versus 1%–2% in the reported literature in which the denominator may have erroneously included large or atypical lipomas 5–7 …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In two recent, independent single‐institution studies focused on this body location, DD disease was observed in only 1%–2% of patients 5,6 . Consistent with this, in a large systemic review of the literature which included data extracted from 18 studies, DD was confirmed in only 9 of 793 (1.1%) of patients 7 . Due to the reported rarity of DD and overall better outcome of these low‐grade tumors, the term “atypical lipomatous tumor” has been suggested as an alternative name for WD liposarcoma of the extremity/trunk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…It is widely accepted that retroperitoneal WDL/DDL and extremity ALT/DDL differ clinically in regard to recurrence rates, dedifferentiation and survival. Extremity liposarcomas have a lower local recurrence rate, dedifferentiate less frequently and have an improved disease specific survival compared to their retroperitoneal counterparts [60,61]. The superior outcomes of extremity liposarcoma are likely due in part to anatomical location, the suitability for radiotherapy and the fact that clear surgical margins are easier to achieve.…”
Section: Comparison Of Genomic Aberrations Between Retroperitoneal Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46,47 The probability of an ALT developing a dedifferentiated component is very low, close to 1%, and this is usually observed only after tumor recurrence. 48…”
Section: Watchful Waitingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of an ALT developing a dedifferentiated component is very low, close to 1%, and this is usually observed only after tumor recurrence 48 . About 5% of DFSP harbor a fibrosarcomatous component that is more aggressive and is associated with a faster growth rate and a metastatic risk that is in the 15% range 46,49,50 .…”
Section: Sts Of the Extremity And Trunkmentioning
confidence: 99%