2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-28032014000100002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases

Abstract: -Context -Colorectal cancer is the second most prevalent cancer worldwide, and the liver is the most common site of metastases. Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases provides the sole possibility of cure and the best odds of long-term survival. Objective -To describe surgical outcomes and identify features associated with disease prognosis in patients submitted to synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis resection. Methods -Retrospective study of 59 patients who underwent surgery for synchron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are those diagnosed before, at the same time 1 or up to six months after the detection of the primary tumor. This definition is heterogeneous in the literature since different publications adopt different times of disease progression of the colorectal tumor to characterize the synchronicity of hepatic lesions, which include intervals of four months 2 , six months 3 , 4 and up to 12 months 5 , 6 . In this consensus, it was decided to adopt the interval of six months because this was the only that demonstrated impact on survival in prospective analysis 7 .…”
Section: Topic 5 - Management Of Synchronous Resectable Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are those diagnosed before, at the same time 1 or up to six months after the detection of the primary tumor. This definition is heterogeneous in the literature since different publications adopt different times of disease progression of the colorectal tumor to characterize the synchronicity of hepatic lesions, which include intervals of four months 2 , six months 3 , 4 and up to 12 months 5 , 6 . In this consensus, it was decided to adopt the interval of six months because this was the only that demonstrated impact on survival in prospective analysis 7 .…”
Section: Topic 5 - Management Of Synchronous Resectable Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por esta razón, se afirma que la cirugía es el único tratamiento que impacta en la supervivencia a largo plazo y, en la actualidad, el esfuerzo terapéutico está dirigido a aumentar el número de candidatos a la resección quirúrgica, ya que solo 15 a 20 % de estos tumores puede resecarse cuando se hace el diagnóstico [10][11][12][13] . Actualmente, existen múltiples estrategias que permiten convertir los casos no aptos para resección en candidatos al manejo quirúrgico, con un impacto positivo en el pronóstico oncológico.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…[24][25][26] Observamos ainda mudança nos conceitos cirúrgicos, com o entendimento de que margens subcentimétricas podem garantir sobrevida tardia e a utilização crescente de técnicas poupadoras de parênquima. [27][28][29] Diversos estudos comparativos demonstraram que a realização de ressecções não-regradas mas com margens microscopicamente livres, visando a conservação de parênquima, não tem impacto negativo no prognóstico destes pacientes, cursando, ao contrário, com maior sobrevida após a recidiva hepática, por aumentar a chance de retratamento locorregional. 20,28 Concomitante a isso, houve uma mudança nos paradigmas do tratamento cirúrgico das MHCCR, desta forma, atualmente, a ressecção das lesões hepáticas não tem mais como limitantes o número, o tamanho ou o acometimento bilateral, e mesmo a presença de doença extra-hepática, desde que ressecável, não é uma contraindicação absoluta à ressecção em casos selecionados.…”
unclassified