2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01524-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical outcomes in patients with optic disc pit maculopathy: does peeling the ILM lead to better outcomes?

Abstract: Purpose Optic disc pits (ODPs) are rare congenital anomalies. Several patients develop optic disc pit maculopathy (ODP-M): visual impairment caused by intra- and/or subretinal fluid. Treatment mode remains controversial. This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and gas tamponade with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM)-peeling in improving visual acuity and reducing subretinal fluid in ODP-M patients. Methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients had complete macular reattachment and a reduction of CRT following surgery. None of the adjunctive procedures were significant predictors of resolution of macular detachment, IRF or CRT improvement, in line with other studies [ 4 , 12 , 15 ]. Some authors claim that even though endolaser and ILM peeling are associated with a faster anatomical result, these are not necessarily associated with better visual outcomes [ 10 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All patients had complete macular reattachment and a reduction of CRT following surgery. None of the adjunctive procedures were significant predictors of resolution of macular detachment, IRF or CRT improvement, in line with other studies [ 4 , 12 , 15 ]. Some authors claim that even though endolaser and ILM peeling are associated with a faster anatomical result, these are not necessarily associated with better visual outcomes [ 10 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In this analysis, however, patients who did not undergo ILM peeling had better visual outcomes independently of preoperative BCVA or age at surgery (Table 1). Other authors have reached the same conclusions [14][15][16], and both the 2014 EVRS Optic Pit Study [17] and a recent review [3] do not support the need for ILM peeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There is also no overwhelming consensus as to whether combining PPV with ILM peeling can increase surgical success [41]. Although combining PPV with an inverted ILM flap and free ILM flap transplantation, autologous scleral flap, or platelets and using Tisseel fibrin sealant techniques have been associated with positive outcomes, Wagner et al demonstrated that ILM peeling did not significantly improve vision [6,42,43]. The multi-center European VitreoRetinal Society (EVRS) Optic Disc Study has provided up-to-date information about the surgery and highlighted that ILM peeling is in fact unnecessary; on the contrary, it was found to increase the risk of developing MHs and was not associated with better vision even though anatomical closure was achieved in some cases of retreatment [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ILM peeling may also facilitate the dispersion of subretinal and intraretinal fluids into the vitreous cavity. Some reports question the usefulness of gas tamponade and ILM peeling for macular retinoschisis associated with pit maculopathy [ 14 , 19 ]. Vitrectomy alone might have improved the macular retinoschisis in the present case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%