2011
DOI: 10.4318/tjg.2011.0188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in scleroatrophic gallbladders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ishikawa et al,2 reported drain usage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases defined as complicated, such as intraoperative excessive bleeding, difficult operations, and intraoperative spread of bile 4. According to the experience and data obtained from this study, drain usage is indicated in cases such as acute complicated cholecystitis, elective scleroatrophic cholelithiasis, when smooth closure cannot be made of a cystic canal, when there is perioperative injury or bleeding, or a history of anticoagulant use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ishikawa et al,2 reported drain usage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases defined as complicated, such as intraoperative excessive bleeding, difficult operations, and intraoperative spread of bile 4. According to the experience and data obtained from this study, drain usage is indicated in cases such as acute complicated cholecystitis, elective scleroatrophic cholelithiasis, when smooth closure cannot be made of a cystic canal, when there is perioperative injury or bleeding, or a history of anticoagulant use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Inclusion criteria for the study were; elective uncomplicated cholelithiasis (Grade 1, 2, 3 gallbladder), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-2-3 patients, and age <70 years. Uncomplicated cholelithiasis criteria were defined by the surgeon during laparoscopic cholecystectomy according to the gall bladder adhesion scoring scale defined by Akoglu et al4 Using this scale of grade 1 = no pericholecystic adhesions, grade 2 = adhesions easily loosened with dissection, grade 3= chronic pericholecystic adhesions showing fibrotic properties permitting dissection, grade 4 = adhesions preventing the easy determination of anatomic structures and making dissection difficult, which are intense accompanied by a thickened gall bladder wall (sclera atrophic cholelithiasis). Exclusion criteria were; grade 4 gallbladder with stones4, conversion cholecystectomy, emergency cholecystectomy, previous upper abdominal surgery, predisposition for bleeding and chronic liver disease, gangrenous and emphysematous cholecystitis, intraoperative injury or bleeding, choledocholithiasis, cholangitis, pancreatitis, and unwillingness to participate in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GB adhesion score developed by Akoğlu et al and intraoperative findings of patients were assessed and recorded by one surgeon (S. C.). [6] Adhesion scoring scale is based on the degree of inflammatory changes in the GB as a guide for predicting the course of operation. During exploration, the extent and thickness of the adhesions in the GB region were graded as follows: grade I, no adhesions; grade II, flimsy adhesions that permit easy dissection; grade III, chronic pericholecystitis and pericholecystic fibrosis making dissection difficult but permitting visualization of the anatomy; and grade IV, thickened GB wall and anatomical distortion due to dense adhesions around the GB, which do not permit safe dissection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%