Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The purpose of this research is to learn the outcomes of lip symmetry after cleft lip repair by Fisher in unilateral cleft lip compared with other techniques. This systematic review searched English full-text available articles in 4 databases: Cochrane, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, and hand searched through grey literature and reference lists. Subjects were those with unilateral cleft lip without syndromic disorders who had primary cleft lip repair. The authors compared the technique by Fisher with other cleft lip repair techniques. Outcomes were lip symmetry determined quantitatively by lip anthropometric measurement and qualitatively by the Steffensen grading criteria. Four studies were included with a total of 150 cleft lip repairs, comparing the technique by Fisher with techniques by Millard, Mohler, and modified Millard. The 4 studies underwent critical appraisal, data analysis, qualitative synthesis, and meta-analysis. Assessment with Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 for randomized controlled trials and “Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies–of Interventions” for nonrandomized studies displayed an overall high risk of bias in the included studies. “Grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation” revealed a very low quality of evidence for this review. All 4 studies noted better subjective lip symmetry in the technique by Fisher, but lip and vermilion height were better after the technique by Millard. This review found superior lip symmetry quality but inferior lip symmetry anthropometry after the technique by Fisher compared with the technique by Millard and its modifications, with a low quality of evidence.
The purpose of this research is to learn the outcomes of lip symmetry after cleft lip repair by Fisher in unilateral cleft lip compared with other techniques. This systematic review searched English full-text available articles in 4 databases: Cochrane, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, and hand searched through grey literature and reference lists. Subjects were those with unilateral cleft lip without syndromic disorders who had primary cleft lip repair. The authors compared the technique by Fisher with other cleft lip repair techniques. Outcomes were lip symmetry determined quantitatively by lip anthropometric measurement and qualitatively by the Steffensen grading criteria. Four studies were included with a total of 150 cleft lip repairs, comparing the technique by Fisher with techniques by Millard, Mohler, and modified Millard. The 4 studies underwent critical appraisal, data analysis, qualitative synthesis, and meta-analysis. Assessment with Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 for randomized controlled trials and “Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies–of Interventions” for nonrandomized studies displayed an overall high risk of bias in the included studies. “Grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation” revealed a very low quality of evidence for this review. All 4 studies noted better subjective lip symmetry in the technique by Fisher, but lip and vermilion height were better after the technique by Millard. This review found superior lip symmetry quality but inferior lip symmetry anthropometry after the technique by Fisher compared with the technique by Millard and its modifications, with a low quality of evidence.
Objective This study aims to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 and the current situation for cleft lip/palate treatment surgeries within Brazil's public health system. Design Our retrospective study analyzed CL/P corrective surgeries in Brazil's health system using DATASUS TabNet data from March 2020 to December 2022, with historical data from January 2016 to February 2020. We employed ARIMA analysis to estimate pandemic-related surgery cancellations. Results In 2020, 1992 (CI 95%: 989–2995) CL/P surgeries were not conducted due to pandemics, a 44.1% (CI 95%: 28.1–54.2%) decrease compared to expectations for march to December 2020. Between the onset of the pandemic in Brazil and the end of 2022, 10,643 surgeries were performed in the country, representing a 33.8% shortfall compared to the expected number for the period (16,076; 95% CI: 9697–22,456). Conclusion The study highlights COVID-19's impact on CL/P surgeries in Brazil. Post-pandemic, surgeries increased but regional disparities remain, urging collaborative efforts to improve services and support affected patients.
: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) represent the most frequently reported congenital anomaly affecting the craniofacial region. The aim of this study was to assess the output (in number of procedures) of the Brazilian hospitals accredited for the treatment of CLP patients, examine the referral flow of patients requiring this type of care, and ascertain the adequacy of the corresponding infrastructure of these healthcare facilities. Methodologically, the study used an observational, cross-sectional, and ecological design. Output data, categorized by state and macro-region, and patient referral flow records were accessible through the Outpatient Information System (SIA, in its Portuguese acronym) and the Hospital Information System (SIH, in Portuguese), respectively. Infrastructure assessment relied on data sourced from the National Register of Health Establishments (CNES, in Portuguese). Analysis encompassed data from 28 accredited hospitals. Concerning output metrics, the state of São Paulo ranked first in the number of procedures conducted. The establishments exhibiting the lowest output performance comprised six hospitals located in the Southeast region and two in the Center-West region. Examination of patient referral flow corroborated the concentration of procedures predominantly conducted in the Southeast, notably within São Paulo state. Infrastructure evaluation encompassed the following categories: physical facilities, diagnostic and therapeutic support services, equipment, and comprehensive multidisciplinary care services. The data showed that roughly 61% of the hospitals surveyed possessed less than half of the recommended items. The primary deficiency identified pertained to inadequacies in equipment availability. Conversely, the best outcomes were associated with diagnostic and therapeutic support services. It was concluded that enhancing hospital infrastructure is imperative for the amelioration of care provision to patients with CLP across all Brazilian states.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.