2009
DOI: 10.3415/vcot-08-01-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical removal of a microchip from a puppy’s spinal canal

Abstract: A 1.6 kg, six-week-old Tibetan Terrier was admitted with a 12-hours history of acute onset of progressive tetraparesis following insertion of a microchip to the dorsal cervical region. Neurological examination indicated a lesion to the Ce(1) to Ce(5) spinal cord segments. Radiographic examination confirmed the intra-spinal location of a microchip foreign body at the level of the second cervical vertebra. Microchip removal was achieved following dorsal hemi-laminectomy; significant intra-operative haemorrhage w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CNS iatrogenic needle injuries have previously been reported following CSF collection attempts from the CMC and caudal lumbar site in dogs, and following microchip implantation in dogs and cats. 58 A self-inflicted needle-stick injury and spinal cord infarction has been described in a human being. 9 In the present case, we suspect that the needle entered the CNS through the atlanto-occipital junction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CNS iatrogenic needle injuries have previously been reported following CSF collection attempts from the CMC and caudal lumbar site in dogs, and following microchip implantation in dogs and cats. 58 A self-inflicted needle-stick injury and spinal cord infarction has been described in a human being. 9 In the present case, we suspect that the needle entered the CNS through the atlanto-occipital junction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical signs associated with foreign bodies in the vertebral canal can be caused by direct injury to the spinal cord by the foreign material, or related to haemorrhage, infection or granuloma formation secondary to the intruding material (Johnston and Summers 1971, Brockman and Trout 1991, Pratt and others 1999, Rayward 2002, Leskovar and others 2003, Dennis and others 2005, Granger and others 2007, Mateo and others 2007, Platt and others 2007, Hicks and Bagley 2008, Smith and Fitzpatrick 2009, Joslyn and others 2010, Schneider and others 2010, Sutton and others 2010, Potanas and others 2011, Tanaka and others 2012, Whitty and others 2013). Needles are very thin and of an inert material, so direct injury of the spinal cord should be theoretically minimal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the foreign bodies found in people's vertebral canals have been pellets, glass fragments, acupuncture needles or epidural catheters that have broken and migrated along the epidural space (Abumi and others 1996, Patrick 2005, Williams and others 2009, Akcakaya and others 2012, Thompson and Aasheim 2012, Keel and others 2013). In veterinary medicine, direct traumatic implantation of microchips in the vertebral canal has been reported in three dogs and one cat (Platt and others 2007, Hicks and Bagley 2008, Smith and Fitzpatrick 2009, Joslyn and others 2010). In three of these cases, acute neurological signs and pain were found (Platt and others 2007, Hicks and Bagley 2008, Smith and Fitzpatrick 2009) and while the third case developed clinical signs three years after microchip placement, it was suspected the implant had been placed within the C5‐C6 interarcuate ligament and epaxial musculature, possibly in contact with the dorsal surface of the cranial left lamina of C6 (Joslyn and others 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations