2016
DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical repair of nasal septal perforations

Abstract: The diversity in surgical techniques demonstrated in this review would indicate that surgeons are not satisfied with the current surgical approaches for the repair of nasal septal perforations. However, the overall closure rates presented in this review are very favorable. Future comparative studies are needed to better evaluate these techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A contemporary review on the surgical repair of nasal septal perforations (NSPs) argued that the diversity of available techniques is because clinicians remain dissatisfied with clinical outcomes and are constantly modifying techniques to improve ultimate surgical results. 1 This was compounded by the lack of comparative data, and it was impossible to determine the true effectiveness of each technique due to the small study cohorts, heterogeneous aetiology and short follow-up period. 2 Qualitative measures of patients' symptoms and a disease-specific tool were also identified as quintessential to improving the quality of clinical studies on NSPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A contemporary review on the surgical repair of nasal septal perforations (NSPs) argued that the diversity of available techniques is because clinicians remain dissatisfied with clinical outcomes and are constantly modifying techniques to improve ultimate surgical results. 1 This was compounded by the lack of comparative data, and it was impossible to determine the true effectiveness of each technique due to the small study cohorts, heterogeneous aetiology and short follow-up period. 2 Qualitative measures of patients' symptoms and a disease-specific tool were also identified as quintessential to improving the quality of clinical studies on NSPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review published in 2016 updated closure outcomes in perforation surgery. 7 Techniques and their variants were grouped into multilayer closures (14 studies), single-layer mucosal flap closure (4 studies), and free patch (scaffolding graft) procedures (8 studies) to facilitate analysis. Unilateral flap and free scaffold graft procedures attempt to decrease the technical difficulty attributed to bilateral flap procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Addition of an interposition graft to mucosal flap repairs improved success rates, but the results did not achieve statistical significance. A review published in 2016 updated closure outcomes in perforation surgery 7 . Techniques and their variants were grouped into multilayer closures (14 studies), single‐layer mucosal flap closure (4 studies), and free patch (scaffolding graft) procedures (8 studies) to facilitate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An updated review of published reports over the subsequent 4 years showed similar pooled success rates for multilayer (using an interposition graft), single layer mucosal flap, and patch "scaffolding" graft techniques. 9 Both reviews noted the inconsistent reporting of perforation size and the need for a validated perforation symptom instrument for the comparison of closure techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%