2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical residents and the adequacy of dictated operative reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The limitations of the study include its retrospective study design and lack of data on the level of training of and specialty of the person dictating the operation report. Studies have consistently demonstrated poorer quality of narrative operation reports dictated by residents versus surgical faculty [22][23][24][25]. In addition, although the surgeons involved in choosing important surgical variables are all experienced in CD surgery, they were not agreed upon using a standard Delphi survey [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of the study include its retrospective study design and lack of data on the level of training of and specialty of the person dictating the operation report. Studies have consistently demonstrated poorer quality of narrative operation reports dictated by residents versus surgical faculty [22][23][24][25]. In addition, although the surgeons involved in choosing important surgical variables are all experienced in CD surgery, they were not agreed upon using a standard Delphi survey [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also found that senior residents and attendings included more pertinent information than first and second year residents. 1 Professional coders looked at operative reports from an academic surgical practice and found that 76 per cent contained one or more audit criteria deficiencies. 2 Resident dictated operative reports have also been found to lead to reduced reimbursement by 9.7 per cent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have shown that there is wide variation in the quality of operative reports in general, and also across levels of training, representing a significant area for improvement with regard to perioperative documentation. [1][2][3] The importance of the operative report can be magnified when dealing with cancer surgery, as intraoperative findings may influence adjuvant treatment, and operative technique may impact patient outcomes. This can be true for rectal cancer surgery, which is challenging due to the confines of operating within the pelvis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%