1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70067-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical revascularization versus thrombolysis for nonembolic lower extremity native artery occlusions: Results of a prospective randomized trial

Abstract: Surgical revascularization for lower extremity native artery occlusions is more effective and durable than thrombolysis. Thrombolysis used initially provides a reduction in the surgical procedure for a majority of patients; however, long-term outcome is inferior, particularly for patients who have an FP occlusion, diabetes, or critical ischemia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
118
2
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 247 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
118
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained in the Introduction, the method is capable of replacing intra-arterial thrombolysis in most cases. The immediate results of rotational thrombectomy are probably more favourable than those following thrombolysis and the complication rate is lower [1,3,6,7]. Nevertheless, we are aware that the comparison of these results with large thrombolytic studies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As explained in the Introduction, the method is capable of replacing intra-arterial thrombolysis in most cases. The immediate results of rotational thrombectomy are probably more favourable than those following thrombolysis and the complication rate is lower [1,3,6,7]. Nevertheless, we are aware that the comparison of these results with large thrombolytic studies (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, we are aware that the comparison of these results with large thrombolytic studies (e.g. STILE, TOPAS) may be misleading as these studies have a completely diff erent design, since they compare thrombolytic treatment with surgical treatment [6,7]. Randomised, multicentre trials comparing thrombolysis with Rotarex mechanical thrombectomy are not yet available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The third landmark study was the Thrombolysis or Peripheral Arterial Surgery (TOPAS) trial [30]. It employed 544 patients with short duration ALI (<14 days) and randomized to urokinase based thrombolysis versus surgery.…”
Section: Catheter-directed Thrombolysis (Cdt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very important step in the protocol is the assessment of the exact location of the thrombosis, as this affects the decision making for the basic therapeutic plan. For example, it is better to treat Aorto-femoral segments surgically (Weaver et al, 1996), while subinguinal areas are more feasible for treatment by angioplasty, thrombolysis, or by a combination of both (Weaver et al, 1996).…”
Section: Treatment Options For Acute Peripheral Thrombosismentioning
confidence: 99%