2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.12.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Splint Design Influences Transverse Expansion in Segmental Maxillary Osteotomies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When groups 1 and 2 were compared, it was observed that the addition of a palatal splint to the surgical protocol of multi-segment maxillary osteotomies improved transverse stability in all posterior teeth. In 2017, Stokbro et al 22 found that not all the planned The posterior transverse stability in this study was also improved compared to previously reported in the literature. 6,8 In fact, Group 1 experienced no significant dental (centroids or gingival landmarks) instability at first or second molars regions, while Group 2 showed significant inter-gingival (−2.2 ± 2.8 mm) and inter-centroids (−1.9 ± 3.0 mm) transverse constriction at second molars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When groups 1 and 2 were compared, it was observed that the addition of a palatal splint to the surgical protocol of multi-segment maxillary osteotomies improved transverse stability in all posterior teeth. In 2017, Stokbro et al 22 found that not all the planned The posterior transverse stability in this study was also improved compared to previously reported in the literature. 6,8 In fact, Group 1 experienced no significant dental (centroids or gingival landmarks) instability at first or second molars regions, while Group 2 showed significant inter-gingival (−2.2 ± 2.8 mm) and inter-centroids (−1.9 ± 3.0 mm) transverse constriction at second molars.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…When groups 1 and 2 were compared, it was observed that the addition of a palatal splint to the surgical protocol of multi‐segment maxillary osteotomies improved transverse stability in all posterior teeth. In 2017, Stokbro et al 22 found that not all the planned expansion is achieved during segmental bimaxillary surgery and that a palatal reinforcement of surgical splint added 0.8 mm to the planned expansion compared with a conventional splint measured one week after surgery. Yao et al 13 and Kretschmer et al 23 found a relapse of 0.8‐1.3 mm from 1‐week to 1‐year follow‐up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of three dimensional (3D) technology in orthognathic surgery enabled new methods for evaluating planning accuracy and assessing stability [6][7][8]. Multiple authors have reported accuracy and stability of segmented Le Fort I osteotomy, often not differentiating the assessment method for segmented and non-segmented Le Fort I osteotomy [5,[9][10][11][12][13]. Furthermore, registrationfree 3D cephalometry or landmark based registration was frequently applied introducing human error in the reported outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 With the advent of these fixation systems, maintaining the SS in position started to be indicated only as an adjunct tool in elastic therapy or in cases of segmental maxilla surgery. [3][4][5][6] Technological advances in the field of computing and the generation of three-dimensional (3D) images have Bibliometrics of Surgical Splints and Orthognathic Surgery Carvalho et al…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%