2022
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.940807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Staging of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Current Status and Research Progress

Abstract: Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) has large localized lesions, high recurrence and metastasis rate under standard treatment, and low survival rate. The current guidelines still use concurrent radiotherapy as the gold standard of treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Several recent studies have shown that surgical staging has higher accuracy in determining metastasis in the para-aortic lymph nodes, bringing survival benefits to some patients. However, the indications for surgical staging and whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, the small number of patients explained by the rarity of advanced cases do not allow us to draw strong conclusions regarding the variants of neoadjuvant treatment, doses, or regimens. The small study group is influenced by the relatively rare cases of patients with cervical cancer in an advanced stage but without invasion into adjacent organs or distant metastases and also who are strong enough to undergo surgical intervention [ 39 ]. Another disadvantage is that we do not have a comparative group in the same stage of cervical cancer in which only neoadjuvant treatment was performed, since the internal protocol applies to all patients, thus being limited to the comparison only with data from the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, the small number of patients explained by the rarity of advanced cases do not allow us to draw strong conclusions regarding the variants of neoadjuvant treatment, doses, or regimens. The small study group is influenced by the relatively rare cases of patients with cervical cancer in an advanced stage but without invasion into adjacent organs or distant metastases and also who are strong enough to undergo surgical intervention [ 39 ]. Another disadvantage is that we do not have a comparative group in the same stage of cervical cancer in which only neoadjuvant treatment was performed, since the internal protocol applies to all patients, thus being limited to the comparison only with data from the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although its incidence has decreased by approximately 40% in the last decade, it currently remains the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women, accounting for an estimated 270,000 women’s lives annually ( 1 ). The use of cervical cancer screening has helped in an early diagnosis of this disease; however, there is still a large population in which the disease is diagnosed in locally advanced stages ( 2 ). In such a scenario, the clinical response rates to conventional treatment based on radiation therapy and/or surgery, chemotherapy ( 3 ), and immunotherapy ( 4 ) are poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%