2005
DOI: 10.1159/000086929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Treatment for Ipsilateral Fractures of Femoral Neck and Shaft

Abstract: Objectives: To review the primary and the final results of surgical management of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures. Subjects and Methods: Seventeen patients (2 female, 15 male, average age 37 years, range 20–60) with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures were treated by compression plate fixation for the femoral shaft fractures and dynamic hip screw or cannulated cancellous screw fixation for the neck fractures in Al-Razi and Al-Jahra Hospitals, Kuwait, from March 1996 to June 2002. The clin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other series reported 2 to 6% of patients developed deep infection. 16,17 In our series, no avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred, consistent with a lower incidence among patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures than in solitary femoral neck fractures (3% vs 10%). 14,18 Compared to other techniques, fixation using a DCP and a DHS for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures is a reliable means of achieving bone union with few complications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other series reported 2 to 6% of patients developed deep infection. 16,17 In our series, no avascular necrosis of the femoral head occurred, consistent with a lower incidence among patients with ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures than in solitary femoral neck fractures (3% vs 10%). 14,18 Compared to other techniques, fixation using a DCP and a DHS for ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures is a reliable means of achieving bone union with few complications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It achieves a union rate of 77 to 93% in the femoral shaft and 93 to 100% in the femoral neck, with 77 to 93% of patients achieving good outcomes. 6,16,17 A high incidence of infection was reported after plating for femoral shaft fractures. 4,9 In our series, 2 (5%) patients developed deep infection, which resolved after debridement and antibiotic treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though recent literature shows favourable results with the use of a single implant i.e., reconstruction type of intramedullary nail, we are of the opinion that treating these combination of fractures with two separate devices (plate-screw combinations) does have a role. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In this study we compared the outcome of ipsilateral hip and shaft femur fractures treated with reconstruction-type intramedullary nailing and various plate combinations on the fracture healing and functional outcome in patients. Very few authors have compared these two methods of fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]  Various plate-screw combinations-including a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and long side plate combination, a hip screw with a short side plate for the neck and separate plate for the shaft or cancellous screws for femoral neck and a plate for the shaft. 13,14,16  Retrograde intramedullary nail of the shaft and screw fixation of the neck.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,25 However, separate device fixation, while being associated with fewer reoperations, 25 is also associated with infection and nonunion. 26…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%