2004
DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200401000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Treatment of Congenital Syndactyly of the Hand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
3
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
62
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The revision rate of our study was very low compared with that of previous studies, which reported revision rates up to 42% [1113]. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The revision rate of our study was very low compared with that of previous studies, which reported revision rates up to 42% [1113]. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…2 The webbing of fingers (unilateral or bilateral variably affecting digits 2 through 5) and toes (bilateral between toes 2 and 3), known as syndactyly, is an additional clinical hallmark. 1,3 Syndactyly is one of the most commonly observed congenital malformations, affecting an estimated 1 in 2000 to 2500 live births (0.04%-0.05%), with regional occurrence rates ranging between 0.06% to 0.12%. [3][4][5][6] The genetic phenomenon of mosaicism, whereby 2 genetically distinct populations of cells coexist within an individual' s somatic cells or gametes, has been observed in TS1 individuals/ families on at least 3 separate occasions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median age at operation was 8 year (range, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The mean postoperative follow-up time was approximately 48 months and 37 months in the groups 1 and 2, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Once web creep occurs, it requires the original procedure again as it may cause deformity in growing bones and joints if not reoperated. 6 In our previous surgeries for syndactyly, especially in complex cases with deformities and fused bones in web space, because we were unable to keep the digits in abducted position, it was hard to achieve proper postoperative wound care. 7,8 Therefore, we failed to prevent postoperative wound complications leading to web creep in considerable amount of webs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%