2001
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200100022-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical Treatment of Flexible Flatfoot in Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
13

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
97
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports have described the use of various materials for subtalar joint arthroereisis including a bone plug, silicone, poly-L-lactic acid and ultra-high weight polyethylene. This procedure has been popularized in the podiatric community [1][2][3]6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reports have described the use of various materials for subtalar joint arthroereisis including a bone plug, silicone, poly-L-lactic acid and ultra-high weight polyethylene. This procedure has been popularized in the podiatric community [1][2][3]6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is believed by some that flexible flatfeet in children, if left untreated, may lead to disabling secondary deformities and foot pain in adolescence or early adulthood, although this has never been substantiated. [1,2] Despite the absence of any convincing evidence that flexible flatfeet actually lead to functional problems or pain, many authors have recommended surgical treatments for children with painless flexible flatfeet. [1,[3][4][5] Among the procedures recommended, subtalar arthroereisis utilizing a high molecular weight polyethylene implant is considered to be a minimally invasive procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arthroereisis by means of synthetic implants was started in the late 1970s because of the reported problems and complications associated with the bony arthroereisis procedures. No less than ten types of synthetic implants and methods for insertion have been reported, most with follow-up of less than 2 years [85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to published descriptions, both are inserted into the sinus tarsi anterior to the posterior facet along the trajectory of the tarsal canal between the posterior and middle facets. The originators of these implants [85,86,90,91], as well as other authors [87,[92][93][94][95]97], and even the product technique manuals, are evasive regarding the depth to which the implants enter the tarsal canal, though they certainly appear to enter it. Nevertheless, proponents consider them to be extra-articular, if inserted properly, because they do not technically touch articular cartilage, though they clearly encroach upon it.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%