2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical treatment of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For patients with pancreatic NETs the 5-year RFS rate after correction for referral bias was 69%, the 5-year OS rate 90%. This is comparable with postoperative results reported in other series [7,14,24,25]. Median RFS tended to be longer in patients with midgut primary (98.8 months) compared to pancreatic primary (45.5 months, p = 0.16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For patients with pancreatic NETs the 5-year RFS rate after correction for referral bias was 69%, the 5-year OS rate 90%. This is comparable with postoperative results reported in other series [7,14,24,25]. Median RFS tended to be longer in patients with midgut primary (98.8 months) compared to pancreatic primary (45.5 months, p = 0.16).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Previous studies have reported median DFS durations of 88 months following resection of ileal NET (Landerholm et al 2011; Le Roux et al 2011) and 80–85 months following resection of panNET (Gomez-Rivera et al 2007; Boninsegna et al 2012). Our median DFS estimates of 70.1 months for patients with small bowel NET and 49.5 months for patients with panNET are somewhat shorter than these previous estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not observe a strong association between lymph node involvement and shorter DFS in patients with panNET. Others have also failed to identify associations between lymph node involvement and DFS in panNET, and have suggested that lymph node ratio, rather than presence or absence of lymph nodes, may be a better prognostic measure for such patients (Gomez-Rivera et al 2007; Casadei et al 2010; Boninsegna et al 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have reported prognostic factors predicting survival after the resection of PETs [7,8,9,10]. To our knowledge, prognostic factors related to the risk of recurrence in PETs have rarely been reported in the literature [11,12,13,14]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the recurrence rate in these patients ranged from 24.5% [13] to 36.3% [14]; the median time of recurrence ranged from 6 [14] to 38 months [12] and the most frequent site of recurrence was the liver [11,12,13,14]. Bilimoria et al [7] reported the prognostic factors predicting survival after the resection of PETs described in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%