Surgical treatment of stomal prolapse: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature

Abstract

Aim This study aimed to assess success, recurrence, and overall complication rates among different surgical procedures for stomal prolapse. Methods This study was a PRISMA‐compliant systematic review. PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched until March 2022. Studies that assessed surgical treatments of stomal prolapse in adults were included. The primary outcome was recurrence of stomal prolapse and the secondary outcome was 30‐day complications. A random‐effect meta‐analysis was used to estimate the weighted mean rates of recurrence. Results Six studies published (111 patients; 103 males) were included. 52 (46.8%) patients had end colostomies, 35 (31.5%) had loop colostomies. Seven procedures were assessed and included local stoma reconstruction (40%), stapled local repair (27%), modified Altemeier technique (10%), mesh strip repair (9%), stoma relocation (6%) redo laparotomy repair (5%), and colectomy and end ileostomy (3%). The weighted mean recurrence rate after local stoma reconstruction was 37.2% (95% CI: −1.8 to 76.3), higher than that after the stapled local repair technique (14.9%; 95% CI: 1.7–28.2). The crude recurrence rate of the modified Altemeier technique was 20%, and of stoma relocation was 66.6%. No recurrence was detected after the mesh strip technique (n = 10). The median follow‐up ranged between 7 months and 2.5 years. Conclusion Several surgical techniques are available to treat stomal prolapse. Local stoma reconstruction may be associated with high rates of recurrence while the stapled local repair and modified Altemeier procedure has relatively low recurrence. Further larger studies are needed to compare the efficacy of these techniques.

Untitled

“…Garoufalia 95 en una revisión sistemática reciente, encontró una recurrencia de 37,2%, 14,9% y 20% para la reconstrucción, resección mediante grapado y Altemeier modificado respectivamente, en tanto que fue notoriamente mayor tras la resección y reubicación (66%).…”