Surgical tumour margins and their significance in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract

There are many prognostic indicators used to predict tumour recurrence and overall prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Most of these biological factors cannot be directly influenced by clinicians managing these heterogeneous group of tumours. Excision margins can potentially be increased at the time of surgery by including more normal tissue than the commonly accepted 1 cm resection distance from the macroscopic tumour edge. However, this can lead to poorer quality of life for patients and does not necessarily address microscopic extensions or dicohesive patterns of tumour growth. Surgical margins can be affected by tissue shrinkage immediately following resection and the choice of instrument used for surgery. Currently, most regard a clear resection margin as being >5 mm, a close margin as more than 1 mm but <5 mm and an involved margin <1 mm. In this article, we provide a brief overview of tumour margins in OSCC, including several recently published large meta‐analyses. Based upon these and other studies, there is still conflicting data in the literature about the ideal margin for OSCC. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests a clearance of 1 mm might be adequate for some cancers. However, adequacy of resection should be considered along with the many other prognostic indicators of OSCC when the multi‐disciplinary team considers further treatment for these patients.

Head and Neck Cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines, Sixth Edition

“… Chemotherapy prevention studies – can novel agents or repurposed drugs support the prevention of high-risk lesions (dysplasia) undergoing malignant transformation? Combination immunotherapy strategies – how and when should immunotherapy be integrated into curative treatment pathways for locally advanced oral cavity cancer? Does the omission of the pathologically node-negative neck from post-operative RT fields reduce toxicity without compromising survival? Are smaller surgical margins safe for smaller non-metastatic cancers? 754 …”

Personalized Medicine in Oral Oncology: Imaging Methods and Biological Markers to Support Diagnosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC): A Narrative Literature Review

“…To date, the conventional OSCC prognostic indicators are related to the pTNM stage at the diagnosis and mainly the depth of invasion and the lymphovascular invasion [ 1 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 ], both responsible for distant metastasis and poor life expectancy [ 77 , 78 ].…”

Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An Update of the Pharmacological Treatment

“…It is important to underline how the likelihood of neck metastasis is significantly higher for the tongue and mouth floor than for the hard palate and gingiva, these latter showing a comparatively low metastasis rate to the neck. Thus, to date, the widely used and accepted treatment for the cervical lymph node metastasis is indeed neck dissection [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].…”