Abstract:The distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the second most common fracture in the elderly population. Despite their frequency, the optimal treatment of these fractures remains controversial. Several dogmatic myths on DRFs management may adversely affect their outcome and despite a strong trend versus surgical options, systematic reviews suggest that conservative treatment remains the safest option for DRFs in most cases.
“…[23] Others concluded that conservative treatment remains the safest option in most cases. [24] In the present meta-analysis, no significant difference between internal fixation and conservative treatment were found. It was presently concluded that closed reduction and plaster immobilization are the best treatment of distal radius fracture.…”
BACKGROUND:The aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes of internal fixation and conservative approach in the treatment of displaced distal radius fractures.
“…[23] Others concluded that conservative treatment remains the safest option in most cases. [24] In the present meta-analysis, no significant difference between internal fixation and conservative treatment were found. It was presently concluded that closed reduction and plaster immobilization are the best treatment of distal radius fracture.…”
BACKGROUND:The aim of the present study was to compare clinical outcomes of internal fixation and conservative approach in the treatment of displaced distal radius fractures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.