The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Protocol) 2001
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retained stone rate reported in various studies is around 8 % [1], varying from 0 to 3.5 % in patients with primary closure [12,29,30]. These rates are similar to those obtained in our group of patients who met the decision criteria included in Fig.…”
Section: %)supporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The retained stone rate reported in various studies is around 8 % [1], varying from 0 to 3.5 % in patients with primary closure [12,29,30]. These rates are similar to those obtained in our group of patients who met the decision criteria included in Fig.…”
Section: %)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…A recent meta-analysis [1,5] found no differences in the mortality and morbidity rates, or the retained stone rate, between laparoscopic surgery and ERCP plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, it has been generally observed that the one-stage treatment is associated with shorter hospital stays and lower costs, which makes it a more cost-effective strategy [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]22]. In our series, the mean hospital stay was 5.1 days, similar to other studies published to date [29,30].…”
Section: %)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations