2018
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.9318-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surgically Diagnosed Primary Hepatic Angiosarcoma

Abstract: Primary hepatic angiosarcoma is a rare tumor originating from endothelial cells in the liver and accounts for approximately 1% of all hepatic malignant tumors. It is difficult to diagnose due to the lack of specific symptoms or tumor markers. No effective treatment exists, but complete surgical resection may achieve a good outcome. Since most primary hepatic angiosarcomas are already at an advanced stage at diagnosis, few reports describe tumors smaller than 2 cm. We report a case of surgery for a 1.7-cm sized… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Angiosarcomas are highly aggressive lesions, and are particularly rare in the liver. Diagnosis of PHA remains challenging since clinical presentation of PHA and radiological findings are usually unspecific [ 6 , 7 , 17 ]. Furthermore, no specific tumor markers are available, so far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angiosarcomas are highly aggressive lesions, and are particularly rare in the liver. Diagnosis of PHA remains challenging since clinical presentation of PHA and radiological findings are usually unspecific [ 6 , 7 , 17 ]. Furthermore, no specific tumor markers are available, so far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with previous reports in the literature. 9,10 The diagnosis of liver angiosarcoma still faces many obstacles and challenges owing to non-specific clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, indecision imaging, and high bleeding risk due to liver biopsy. According to Tsunematsu's report, a case was not performed a biopsy of a liver tumor that was suspected to be malignant based on pre-operative imaging, but liver angiosarcoma was diagnosed only after surgical resection of the liver tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Tsunematsu’s report, a case was not performed a biopsy of a liver tumor that was suspected to be malignant based on pre-operative imaging, but liver angiosarcoma was diagnosed only after surgical resection of the liver tumor. 10 Averbukh et al performed the first ultrasound-guided liver biopsy and detected no evidence of malignancy, but a second biopsy after two months revealed a liver angiosarcoma at an advanced stage. 4 Laparoscopic liver biopsy has certain advantages, including direct tumor detection, selection of specimen collection sites, and post-biopsy bleeding control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognosis for patients with liver angiosarcoma is extremely grim with mean survival around 6 months due to early distant metastasis to other organs such as the lungs, spleen, and colon [ [9] , [10] , [11] ]. There are some environmental risk factors linked to liver angiosarcomas such as the use of an oral contraceptive pill or anabolic steroids, radiation exposure, arsenic, vinyl chloride, and Thorotrast (a suspension of radioactive compound thorium dioxide, that was used as a radiocontrast agent until 1950s) which contribute to increasing the incidence of hepatic angiosarcoma [ 12 , 13 ]. Diagnosis of hepatic angiosarcoma is challenging since patients usually present with nonspecific symptoms including right upper quadrant abdominal pain, weight loss, fever, and fatigue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%