2018
DOI: 10.1007/13836_2018_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surmounting the Large-Genome “Problem” for Genomic Data Generation in Salamanders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study also demonstrates the power of reduced representation genome scans for identifying sex-linked genes in organisms that lack pre-existing genetic resources. Our results further suggest that genome size may not necessarily be a limiting factor in generating informative genome-scale data to answer evolutionary questions in salamanders [see also Nunziata et al (2017); Murphy et al (2018); Weisrock et al (2018); Hu et al (2019)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study also demonstrates the power of reduced representation genome scans for identifying sex-linked genes in organisms that lack pre-existing genetic resources. Our results further suggest that genome size may not necessarily be a limiting factor in generating informative genome-scale data to answer evolutionary questions in salamanders [see also Nunziata et al (2017); Murphy et al (2018); Weisrock et al (2018); Hu et al (2019)].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Reduced representation genomic approaches, such as restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) (Baird et al 2008; Baxter et al 2011; Peterson et al 2012), have become a powerful alternative to WGS to identify sex chromosome-associated loci and to distinguish male- from female-heterogametic systems (Palaiokostas et al 2013; Brown et al 2016; Fowler and Buonaccorsi 2016; Gamble 2016; Lambert et al 2016; Brelsford et al 2017; Nielsen et al 2018; Stovall et al 2018; Jeffries et al 2018; Hu et al 2019). RADseq-based approaches involve inherent tradeoffs among the numbers of loci sequenced, their depths of sequencing coverage, and the numbers of individuals that can be effectively multiplexed on current high-throughput sequencing platforms (Weisrock et al 2018). Double digest RADseq (ddRADseq) protocols (Peterson et al 2012) are particularly well-suited to identify sex chromosome-associated regions in massive genomes because they can be readily tailored to target different numbers of loci in a given species by varying either of the restriction enzymes (REs) used and/or the particular fragment size-selection window (Figure S1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most notably, while eight microsatellite markers and one mitochondrial gene allowed us to document basic patterns (e.g., little to no evidence for hybridization, likely expansion of P. cinereus ), these markers had limited resolution for evaluating more detailed demographic scenarios. In principle, population genomic approaches (e.g., Weisrock et al, 2018) could allow us to better estimate the rate of spread of P. cinereus and the rate of population growth within the contact zone. Second, our study was restricted to the high‐elevation contact zone at the northeastern edge of the range of P. hubrichti .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, WGS is the gold standard, as it provides the most comprehensive datasets, allowing for a deeper understanding of population history. However, factors such as large and/or complex genomes, the need for a certain minimum sample size (of sequenced individuals) for robust statistical analyses, and poor starting DNA quality are often prohibitive (Wandeler, Hoeck, & Keller, ; Weisrock et al, ) to this approach. This often leads researchers to employ RRL methods, where short genetic regions across the nuclear genome are sequenced, yielding a large number of (more or less) independent sites for comparisons across individuals and populations, while retaining the option of including a large number of individuals (Baird et al, ; Davey et al, ).…”
Section: Which Population Characteristics Can Currently Be Estimated mentioning
confidence: 99%