1973
DOI: 10.1177/0038022919730206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surplus Cattle in India: A Critical Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the early 1960s, it was generally accepted by economists and agricultural scientists that India's bovine stock was surplus relative to available feed supply (Misra, 1973). To prevent the ‘slaughter of useful milch animals in the cities’, the expert committee called for ‘re‐organizing [urban] milk supply’ (Government of India, 1955, p. 40).…”
Section: Living Waste: the Colonial Roots Of India's Surplus Cattlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By the early 1960s, it was generally accepted by economists and agricultural scientists that India's bovine stock was surplus relative to available feed supply (Misra, 1973). To prevent the ‘slaughter of useful milch animals in the cities’, the expert committee called for ‘re‐organizing [urban] milk supply’ (Government of India, 1955, p. 40).…”
Section: Living Waste: the Colonial Roots Of India's Surplus Cattlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sale of dry animals for slaughter becomes under these conditions, an economic necessity. The only way in which the present abuse can be permanently prevented is to follow the method found most suitable by other countries namely the removal of cattle from the cities and the arrangements of milk supplies from rural areas (Government of India, 1955, emphasis added) By the early 1960s, it was generally accepted by economists and agricultural scientists that India's bovine stock was surplus relative to available feed supply (Misra, 1973). To prevent the 'slaughter of useful milch animals in the cities', the expert committee called for 're-organizing [urban] milk supply' (Government of India, 1955, p. 40).…”
Section: Creating Surplusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The controversy has been going on intermittently for several years with estimates ranging from at least 80 million useless cattle to scarcely any surplus at all (Joshi 1956;Ravenholt 1966;Dandekar 1969;Misra 1973). This had led to general confusion and often an oversimplification of the issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He argues, &dquo;My intention is to argue that explanation of taboos, customs, and rituals associated with management of cattle be sought in positive functioned and probably the adaptive process of the ecological system of which they are a part rather than in the influence of Hindu theology&dquo; (1966: 51). A large number of social scientists have opposed Harris's techno-environmental interpretation of the sacred-the cow ideology in India (Dandekar: 1964), Heston (1971), Mishra (1973;1978), Simoons (1979), Lodrick (1979), and Freed and Freed (1981). The negative functioned traits of the religious proscriptions against the slaughter of cattle have been used as evidence to argue that religious beliefs rather than technoenvironmental adaptation influence behaviour towards the the cow in India.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%