2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9020265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surplus, Scarcity and Soil Fertility in Pre-Industrial Austrian Agriculture—The Sustainability Costs of Inequality

Abstract: This paper takes a Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research (LTSER) perspective to integrate important aspects of social inequality into Socio-Ecological Metabolism (SEM) research. SEM has dealt with biophysical features of pre-industrial agricultural systems from a largely apolitical perspective, neglecting social relations and conditions of peasant production and reproduction. One of the politically and economically most important manorial systems in Early Modern Austria (Grundherrschaft Grafenegg) serves as a ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice was taken of the therapeutic effect of such an activity in farming and of the elements concerning human wellbeing. Consequently, sustainable agriculture is better than industrial agriculture because it does not have a negative impact on the rural population, impoverishing farmers and, thus, depriving them of opportunities for development [13]. In that context, there is the need for the balance between all three dimensions of sustainable development.…”
Section: Social Values In Farms' Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice was taken of the therapeutic effect of such an activity in farming and of the elements concerning human wellbeing. Consequently, sustainable agriculture is better than industrial agriculture because it does not have a negative impact on the rural population, impoverishing farmers and, thus, depriving them of opportunities for development [13]. In that context, there is the need for the balance between all three dimensions of sustainable development.…”
Section: Social Values In Farms' Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The income aspect is usually raised in the context of sustainable farming. Examples from various countries (Argentina, Austria, Bulgaria, and other developing countries, including the Third World) show that sustainable agriculture is better than industrial agriculture because it does not have a negative impact on the rural population, impoverishing farmers and thus depriving them of opportunities for development [9][10][11][12]. Bacon et al [13] and Hediger [14] argued that sustainable agriculture reduces some of the social costs of industrial farming and vice-versa: the higher socio-economic stability, the stronger the willingness to manifest pro-ecological attitudes, and, for instance, to participate in agri-environmental schemes [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J. R. McNeill and Verena Winiwarter (2006) aimed to jump-start the topic in a collection with global scope. Around the same time, several articles presented detailed analysis of soil nutrients, especially nitrogen, in historical agroecosystems (Allen 2008;Cunfer 2004;González de Molina 2002;Krausmann 2004) and more have emerged in recent years, most of them published in sustainability science journals (Aguilera et al 2018;Delgadillo-Vargas et al 2016;Galán del Castillo 2017;García-Ruiz et al 2012;Gingrich et al 2015;Gizicki-Neundlinger and Güldner 2017;Güldner and Krausmann 2017;Güldner et al 2016;Olarieta et al 2019;Tello et al 2012).…”
Section: Soil History and Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%