2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2010.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrogate antigens as targets for proteome-wide binder selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 The specificity of several scFvs antibodies were previously validated using well-characterized, standardized serum samples (with known analytes of the targeted analytes), and orthogonal methods, such as mass spectrometry (affinity pull-down experiments), ELISA, MesoScale Discovery assay, cytometric bead assay, as well as using spike-in and blocking experiments. 1921,3338…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 The specificity of several scFvs antibodies were previously validated using well-characterized, standardized serum samples (with known analytes of the targeted analytes), and orthogonal methods, such as mass spectrometry (affinity pull-down experiments), ELISA, MesoScale Discovery assay, cytometric bead assay, as well as using spike-in and blocking experiments. 1921,3338…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question should not be whether array-based measurement can work, but how. The solution(s) may lie in developing better binders [7,33], sample fractionation [19], in-solution capture [18], or new and creative modes of dual specificity detection such as the proximity ligation assay [34]. Regardless, we need better standards for assay performance and specificity.…”
Section: Conclusion and Suggestions For Further Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity, affinity, and onchip functionality have been assured using stringent phagedisplay screening and selection protocols using different sample formats ranging from pure proteins, mixtures of pure proteins to crude samples (Soderlind et al, 2000). In addition, the specificity of selected antibodies has been validated using pure proteins, mixtures of pure proteins, as well as wellcharacterized, standardized serum samples i) with known levels of the targeted analyte(s), ii) spiked with known level of specific protein(s), and/or iii) depleted of the targeted protein(s), and/or orthogonal methods such as mass spectrometry (affinity pull-down experiments), ELISA, Meso Scale Discovery assay and cytometric bead assay, as well as spiking and blocking experiments ( Supplementary Table 1) (Carlsson et al, 2011b;Dexlin-Mellby et al, 2010;Gustavsson et al, 2011;Ingvarsson et al, 2007Ingvarsson et al, , 2008Kristensson et al, 2012;Pauly et al, 2013;Wingren et al, 2007). Despite stringent selection and validation protocols, one limitation is the lack of information on fine specificity concerning proteoforms, translational modifications and potential complex formations.…”
Section: Generation Of Antibody Microarraysmentioning
confidence: 99%