2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019wr025366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrogate‐Based Joint Estimation of Subsurface Geological and Relative Permeability Parameters for High‐Dimensional Inverse Problem by Use of Smooth Local Parameterization

Abstract: This paper introduces an efficient surrogate model with the aim of accelerating joint estimation of subsurface geological properties and relative permeability parameters for high‐dimensional inversion problems. We fully replace the high‐fidelity model with a set of subdomain linear models through integrating model linearization with smooth local parameterization where the Gaussian geological parameters and non‐Gaussian facies indicators are locally parameterized. These subdomain linear models with smooth local… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the aperture fields generated from such a low‐dimensional latent space have little variance and are relatively smooth (i.e., low model complexity), as shown in the first row of Figures 7 and 8. After ES‐MDA, the 720 parameter sets collapse to the same posterior parameter set (Figure S1 in Supporting Information ), similar to the small ensemble size‐induced ensemble collapse phenomenon reported in many previous studies (Nejadi et al., 2017; Xiao & Tian, 2020). However, the simulation results from this posterior parameter set cannot correctly fit the “true” data (Figures 5a and 6a), which is an indicator of underfitting.…”
Section: Aperture Inversion and Thermal Prediction With Different Mod...supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because the aperture fields generated from such a low‐dimensional latent space have little variance and are relatively smooth (i.e., low model complexity), as shown in the first row of Figures 7 and 8. After ES‐MDA, the 720 parameter sets collapse to the same posterior parameter set (Figure S1 in Supporting Information ), similar to the small ensemble size‐induced ensemble collapse phenomenon reported in many previous studies (Nejadi et al., 2017; Xiao & Tian, 2020). However, the simulation results from this posterior parameter set cannot correctly fit the “true” data (Figures 5a and 6a), which is an indicator of underfitting.…”
Section: Aperture Inversion and Thermal Prediction With Different Mod...supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Water Resources Research 10.1029/2023WR036146 collapse phenomenon reported in many previous studies (Nejadi et al, 2017;Xiao & Tian, 2020). However, the simulation results from this posterior parameter set cannot correctly fit the "true" data (Figures 5a and 6a), which is an indicator of underfitting.…”
Section: Comparison Between "True" and Simulated Tracer Pressure And ...mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, only the field within the inscribed circle of the generated 800 m × 800 m aperture field is used for flow, tracer and thermal simulation. S1 in the Supporting Information), similar to the small ensemble size-induced ensemble collapse phenomenon reported in many previous studies (Nejadi et al, 2017;Xiao & Tian, 2020). However, the simulation results from this posterior parameter set cannot correctly fit the "true" data (Figs.…”
Section: Parameterizationsupporting
confidence: 79%