Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in chemotherapy and radiotherapy trials in operable and locally advanced lung cancer: a re-analysis of meta-analyses of individual patients' data

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe gold standard endpoint in clinical trials of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for lung cancer is overall survival. Although reliable and simple to measure, this endpoint takes years to observe. Surrogate endpoints that would enable earlier assessments of treatment effects would be useful. We assessed the correlations between potential surrogate endpoints and overall survival at individual and trial levels.MethodsWe analysed individual patients' data from 15 071 patients involved in 60 randomised clinical trials that were assessed in six meta-analyses. Two meta-analyses were of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer, three were of sequential or concurrent chemotherapy, and one was of modified radiotherapy in locally advanced lung cancer. We investigated disease-free survival (DFS) or progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomisation to local or distant relapse or death, and locoregional control, defined as the time to the first local event, as potential surrogate endpoints. At the individual level we calculated the squared correlations between distributions of these three endpoints and overall survival, and at the trial level we calculated the squared correlation between treatment effects for endpoints.FindingsIn trials of adjuvant chemotherapy, correlations between DFS and overall survival were very good at the individual level (ρ2=0·83, 95% CI 0·83–0·83 in trials without radiotherapy, and 0·87, 0·87–0·87 in trials with radiotherapy) and excellent at trial level (R2=0·92, 95% CI 0·88–0·95 in trials without radiotherapy and 0·99, 0·98–1·00 in trials with radiotherapy). In studies of locally advanced disease, correlations between PFS and overall survival were very good at the individual level (ρ2 range 0·77–0·85, dependent on the regimen being assessed) and trial level (R2 range 0·89–0·97). In studies with data on locoregional control, individual-level correlations were good (ρ2=0·71, 95% CI 0·71–0·71 for concurrent chemotherapy and ρ2=0·61, 0·61–0·61 for modified vs standard radiotherapy) and trial-level correlations very good (R2=0·85, 95% CI 0·77–0·92 for concurrent chemotherapy and R2=0·95, 0·91–0·98 for modified vs standard radiotherapy).InterpretationWe found a high level of evidence that DFS is a valid surrogate endpoint for overall survival in studies of adjuvant chemotherapy involving patients with non-small-cell lung cancers, and PFS in those of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced lung cancers. Extrapolation to targeted agents, however, is not automatically warranted.FundingProgramme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, British Medical Research Council, Sanofi-Aventis.

Improving survival of patients with locally advanced non-small-cell cancer remains a challenge: comment to PROCLAIM

“…The trial, therefore, once again stresses the well known difficulty of improving survival of patients with locally advanced NSCLC. The fact that a lack of benefit was seen both for survival and progression-free survival is consistent with a previous report that progression-free survival is a valid surrogate endpoint for overall survival in studies of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced lung cancers (7). As a positive finding, the PROCLAIM study demonstrated an acceptable safety profile of pemetrexed plus cisplatin.…”

Challenges and Methodologies in Using Progression Free Survival as a Surrogate for Overall Survival in Oncology

“…STE is defined as the minimum treatment effect on the surrogate necessary to predict a non-zero effect on the true endpoint (47). It is normally presented as a Hazard Ratio (Table 3).…”

A quantitative method for measurement of HL-60 cell apoptosis based on diffraction imaging flow cytometry technique

“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was calculated for analysis of correlations between the t p dependence of the results obtained with different methods. [28]. Statistical analysis was performed with SigmaPlot (12.0, Systat Software).…”