2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrogate modeling of deformable joint contact using artificial neural networks

Abstract: Deformable joint contact models can be used to estimate loading conditions for cartilage-cartilage, implant-implant, human-orthotic, and foot-ground interactions. However, contact evaluations are often so expensive computationally that they can be prohibitive for simulations or optimizations requiring thousands or even millions of contact evaluations. To overcome this limitation, we developed a novel surrogate contact modeling method based on artificial neural networks (ANNs). The method uses special sampling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models utilized a variety of techniques, such as response surface optimization [6], Lazy Learning [4], nonlinear dynamic models [5], Kriging [8][9][10], and 94 artificial neural networks (ANN) [5,7,11]. Recently, Eskinazi and Fregly (2015) proposed a surrogate modeling approach based on ANN to accelerate an FE deformable contact 96 model of TKR [11]. Artificial neural networks are known, among others, for their ability to learn virtually any complex relationship between a set of input and output variables 98…”
Section: Bio-16-1267mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models utilized a variety of techniques, such as response surface optimization [6], Lazy Learning [4], nonlinear dynamic models [5], Kriging [8][9][10], and 94 artificial neural networks (ANN) [5,7,11]. Recently, Eskinazi and Fregly (2015) proposed a surrogate modeling approach based on ANN to accelerate an FE deformable contact 96 model of TKR [11]. Artificial neural networks are known, among others, for their ability to learn virtually any complex relationship between a set of input and output variables 98…”
Section: Bio-16-1267mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the associated large computational requirements and challenges in validating resulting predictions may represent additional factors limiting the effective translation to clinical setting. In this scenario, high‐fidelity formulations could be synthesized into simpler, surrogate models that describe the complex musculoskeletal structures using computationally efficient structures such as multidimensional splines, regressive polynomials, or artificial neural networks . These could be coupled with neural‐based EMG‐informed modeling and create fully personalized, clinically viable formulations, which capture neurophysiological, anatomical, and morphological abnormalities altogether.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TF model outputs medial and lateral superior-inferior forces ( Fymed and Fylat) to describe the medial-lateral load split. The inputs and outputs to each stage were chosen using a previously defined method [35]. For both models, the contact loads that were highly sensitive to pose parameter variations were fit as functions of the pose parameters while the insensitive loads were fit as functions of the pose parameters and the sensitive loads calculated in the earlier stages.…”
Section: Example Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%