2020
DOI: 10.1002/mmce.22268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrogate modeling of impedance matching transformers by means ofvariable‐fidelityelectromagnetic simulations and nestedcokriging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A typical way of incorporating low-fidelity data is through appropriate correction (e.g., space mapping [40], adaptive response correction [75], manifold mapping [76]). Another approach is to enable reduced-cost parameter space exploration within machine learning frameworks [49], or to exploit model correlations in variable-fidelity modelling methods such as co-kriging [77]. Perhaps the most serious inconvenience associated with these methods is a need to properly set up (or construct for that matter) the low-fidelity model.…”
Section: Multi-resolution Em Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical way of incorporating low-fidelity data is through appropriate correction (e.g., space mapping [40], adaptive response correction [75], manifold mapping [76]). Another approach is to enable reduced-cost parameter space exploration within machine learning frameworks [49], or to exploit model correlations in variable-fidelity modelling methods such as co-kriging [77]. Perhaps the most serious inconvenience associated with these methods is a need to properly set up (or construct for that matter) the low-fidelity model.…”
Section: Multi-resolution Em Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of modeling of highfrequency structures, it is more suitable for handling components that exhibit wideband characteristics where the discrepancies between the models of various fidelities are mostly vertical (i.e., concern the response levels rather than frequency shifts). In [83] and [88], the nested kriging was combined with co-kriging, which is rather straightforward: the first-level model is constructed in a traditional manner (cf. Section II), whereas the final surrogate is a co-kriging one, using a limited number of high-fidelity data.…”
Section: E Nested Kriging With Variable-fidelity Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some popular methods of this category include space mapping 39 , cognition-driven design 40 , or various response correction methods 41 , 42 . A related class of techniques are those based on variable- and multi-fidelity simulations, e.g., co-kriging 43 , multi-fidelity procedures 44 , as well as optimization frameworks involving supervised learning 45 , 46 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%