Surrogate Models for Performance Prediction of Axial Compressors Using through-Flow Approach

Abstract

Two-dimensional design and analysis issues on the meridional surface, which is important in the preliminary design procedure of compressors, are highly dependent on the accuracy of empirical models, such as the prediction of total pressure loss model and turning flow angle. Most of the widely used models are derived or improved from experimental data of some specific cascades with low-loading and low-speed airfoil types. These models may work for most conventional compressors but are incapable of accurately estimating the performance for some specific cases like transonic compressors. The errors made by these models may mislead the final design results. Therefore, surrogate models are developed in this work to reduce the errors and replace the conventional empirical models in the through-flow calculation procedure. A group of experimental data considering a two-stage transonic compressor is used to generate the airfoils database for training the surrogate models. Sensitivity analysis is applied to select the most influential features. Two supervised learning approaches including support vector regression (SVR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR) are used to train the models with a Bayesian optimization algorithm to obtain the optimal hyper parameters. The trained models are integrated into the through-flow code based on streamline curvature method (SLC) to predict the overall performance and internal flow field of the transonic compressor on five rotational speed lines for validation. The predictions are compared with the experimental data and the results of conventional empirical models. The comparison shows that SVR and GPR respectively reduce the predicted error of empirical models by 62.2% and 55.2% for the total pressure ratio and 48.4% and 50.1% for adiabatic efficiency on average. This suggests that the surrogate models constitute an alternative way to predict the performance of airfoils in through-flow calculation where empirical models are inefficient.

Applications of machine learning approaches in aerodynamic aspects of axial flow compressors: A review

“…Intelligent methods are usable for modeling more than one output. For instance, in a work (Wu et al, 2019), two methods, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Support Vector Regression (SVR), were applied to model adiabatic efficiency and total pressure ratio. In the case of applying SVR, the predicted error of the empirical model was reduced by 62.2% and 48.4% for the total pressure ratio and adiabatic efficiency, respectively.…”

Loss prediction of axial compressors using genetic algorithm–back propagation neural network in throughflow method

“…16 Due to its capability of handing strong nonlinearity and insensitivity to the curse of dimensionality, many efforts have been expended on the use of ANN to study the thermo-fluids systems. [17][18][19][20][21] Though application of ANN in the field of turbomachinery design and optimization has proliferated in recent years, effort in development and improvement of empirical correlation models is lacking.…”

Optimization Of A Squirrel Cage Fan

“…Multiple surrogate models are used in the design optimization such as radial basis functions, polynomial regression, neural networks, etc. In this study, the Kriging metamodel is selected to its ability to predict accurately the efficiency on axial and centrifugal fans [21] and to model different function typologies. The Kriging surrogate (Gaussian process) is based on the achievement of a Gaussian stochastic process to the modeled objective functions.…”